share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Hello Group Inc. (NASDAQ:MOMO) Institutional Owners After Losing 20% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Hello Group Inc. (NASDAQ:MOMO) Institutional Owners After Losing 20% Over the Past Year

在過去一年中下跌了20%之後,最近的上漲可能會安撫Hello Group Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MOMO)的機構所有者
Simply Wall St ·  04/20 21:55

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Hello Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders own 22% of Hello Group
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Hello Group的股價可能會受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前 8 名股東擁有公司 50% 的股份
  • 內部人士擁有Hello Group22%的股份

Every investor in Hello Group Inc. (NASDAQ:MOMO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 56% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Hello Group Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MOMO)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有56%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Last week's US$54m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 20% losses.

機構投資者可能會對上週的5400萬美元市值收益表示讚賞,尤其是在經歷了20%的虧損一年之後。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hello Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Hello Group的信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:MOMO Ownership Breakdown April 20th 2024
NASDAQGS: MOMO 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hello Group?

關於Hello Group,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Hello Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hello Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Hello Group確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Hello Group的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:MOMO Earnings and Revenue Growth April 20th 2024
納斯達克GS:MOMO收益和收入增長 2024年4月20日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 5.0% of Hello Group shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Yan Tang with 21% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。看來Hello Group的5.0%的股票是由對沖基金控制的。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官唐巖,已發行股份的21%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.2%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.0%的所有權。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前8名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Hello Group

你好 Group 的內幕所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Hello Group Inc.. Insiders own US$227m worth of shares in the US$1.0b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Hello Group Inc.的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家價值10億美元的公司價值2.27億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Hello Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Hello Group17%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Hello Group (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了 Hello Group 的 2 個警告標誌(1 個有點不愉快!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論