share_log

Dingdong (Cayman) Limited's (NYSE:DDL) Largest Shareholder, CEO Liang Changlin Sees Holdings Value Fall by 18% Following Recent Drop

Dingdong (Cayman) Limited's (NYSE:DDL) Largest Shareholder, CEO Liang Changlin Sees Holdings Value Fall by 18% Following Recent Drop

叮噹菜(開曼)有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:DDL)的最大股東兼首席執行官梁長林認爲,繼最近下跌之後,其持股價值下降了18%
Simply Wall St ·  04/19 18:12

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Dingdong (Cayman)'s growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Institutions own 23% of Dingdong (Cayman)
  • 內部人士似乎對叮噹菜(開曼)的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的股權中可以看出
  • 共有3位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲52%
  • 機構擁有叮噹菜(開曼)23%的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (NYSE:DDL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 40% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了叮噹(開曼)有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:DDL),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。個人內部人士擁有40%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And following last week's 18% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌18%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Dingdong (Cayman).

在下圖中,我們放大了叮噹菜(開曼)的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:DDL Ownership Breakdown April 19th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DDL 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 19 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dingdong (Cayman)?

關於叮噹菜(開曼),機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Dingdong (Cayman) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Dingdong (Cayman)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,叮噹菜(開曼)確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看叮噹菜(開曼)的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:DDL Earnings and Revenue Growth April 19th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DDL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 19 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Dingdong (Cayman). The company's CEO Liang Changlin is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對叮噹菜(開曼)進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官梁長林是最大股東,已發行股份的40%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.4%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有6.0%的所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其52%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Dingdong (Cayman)

叮噹菜(開曼)的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Dingdong (Cayman) Limited. It has a market capitalization of just US$234m, and insiders have US$94m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有叮噹菜(開曼)有限公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲2.34億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值9400萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 22%, private equity firms could influence the Dingdong (Cayman) board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有22%的股份,可能會影響叮噹菜(開曼)董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Dingdong (Cayman) has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例,叮噹菜(開曼)有 1 個我們認爲你應該注意的警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論