share_log

Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 44% of the Company

Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 44% of the Company

荷蘭兄弟公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BROS)主要由擁有公司44%股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  04/18 02:08

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Dutch Bros' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 44% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,荷蘭兄弟的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 44% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

A look at the shareholders of Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看荷蘭兄弟公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BROS)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲44%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Dutch Bros, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究荷蘭兄弟的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BROS Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BROS 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dutch Bros?

關於荷蘭兄弟,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Dutch Bros. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Dutch Bros, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者持有荷蘭兄弟的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看荷蘭兄弟過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BROS Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BROS 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 17 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Dutch Bros. TSG Consumer Partners, LP is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.1% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.1% and 4.5% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對荷蘭兄弟進行有意義的投資。TSG Consumer Partners, LP目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份佔7.1%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.1%和4.5%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Dutch Bros

荷蘭兄弟的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Dutch Bros Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$306m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有荷蘭兄弟公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值3.06億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Dutch Bros. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有荷蘭兄弟44%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 7.1%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司擁有7.1%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Dutch Bros .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在荷蘭兄弟身上發現的兩個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論