share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HOWL) Recent US$53m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HOWL) Recent US$53m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構所有者可能會忽略Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc.”s(納斯達克股票代碼:HOWL)由於長期利潤保持不變,最近市值下降了5300萬美元
Simply Wall St ·  04/13 22:39

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Werewolf Therapeutics implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 各機構持有Werewolf Therapeutics的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 6 名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOWL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 33% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:HOWL),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有33%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$53m last week. However, the 82% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值下降了5300萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,82%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Werewolf Therapeutics.

在下圖中,我們放大了Werewolf Therapeutics的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:HOWL Ownership Breakdown April 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:Howl 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Werewolf Therapeutics?

關於狼人療法,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Werewolf Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Werewolf Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Werewolf Therapeutics確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Werewolf Therapeutics過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:HOWL Earnings and Revenue Growth April 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:HOWL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 13 日

It looks like hedge funds own 21% of Werewolf Therapeutics shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is RA Capital Management, L.P., with ownership of 14%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 8.1% of the stock. In addition, we found that Daniel Hicklin, the CEO has 1.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

看來對沖基金擁有狼人療法21%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。該公司的最大股東是RA Capital Management, L.P.,其所有權爲14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約10%和8.1%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官丹尼爾·希克林將1.5%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有6人約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Werewolf Therapeutics

狼人療法的內部人士所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$217m, and insiders have US$4.3m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲2.17億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值430萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司20%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 24%, private equity firms could influence the Werewolf Therapeutics board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有24%的股份,可能會影響狼人療法董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Werewolf Therapeutics (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了Werewolf Therapeutics的4個警告信號(其中一個不容忽視),你應該注意這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論