share_log

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KD) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 73% of the Company

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KD) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 73% of the Company

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:KD)主要由擁有公司73%股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  04/04 18:10

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Kyndryl Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構對Kyndryl Holdings的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有17名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:KD),了解業務的所有權結構很重要。機構擁有73%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Kyndryl Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Kyndryl Holdings的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:KD Ownership Breakdown April 4th 2024
紐約證券交易所:KD 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kyndryl Holdings?

關於Kyndryl Holdings,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kyndryl Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kyndryl Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在Kyndryl Holdings中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Kyndryl Holdings的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:KD Earnings and Revenue Growth April 4th 2024
紐約證券交易所:KD 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 4 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Kyndryl Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 9.6% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Jupiter Fund Management Plc are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。Kyndryl Holdings不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲11%。貝萊德公司和木星基金管理有限公司分別擁有9.6%和4.7%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前17名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Kyndryl Holdings

Kyndryl Holdings 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$32m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值3200萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司26%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定對他們有利,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論