share_log

While Institutions Invested in Blend Labs, Inc. (NYSE:BLND) Benefited From Last Week's 8.7% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most

While Institutions Invested in Blend Labs, Inc. (NYSE:BLND) Benefited From Last Week's 8.7% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most

儘管投資Blend Labs, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:BLND)的機構受益於上週8.7%的漲幅,但散戶投資者的收益最大
Simply Wall St ·  03/29 19:06

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Blend Labs' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 17 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Blend Labs is 32%
  • Blend Labs擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 前17名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • Blend Labs 的機構所有權爲 32%

Every investor in Blend Labs, Inc. (NYSE:BLND) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Blend Labs, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:BLND)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲43%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$66m market cap gain, institutions too had a 32% share in those profits.

儘管散戶投資者是從上週6600萬美元市值增長中受益最大的群體,但機構在這些利潤中也佔有32%的份額。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Blend Labs.

在下圖中,我們放大了 Blend Labs 的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BLND Ownership Breakdown March 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BLND 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Blend Labs?

關於Blend Labs,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Blend Labs already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Blend Labs' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Blend Labs已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Blend Labs的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BLND Earnings and Revenue Growth March 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BLND 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 29 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Blend Labs. Our data shows that General Atlantic Service Company, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 7.6% of shares outstanding. Formation8 Partners, LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and 8VC holds about 5.3% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Nima Ghamsari is the owner of 3.8% of the company's shares.

對沖基金在 Blend Labs 的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,通用大西洋服務有限責任公司是最大股東,已發行股份佔7.6%。Formation8 Partners, LLC是第二大股東,擁有6.4%的普通股,8VC持有公司約5.3%的股份。此外,首席執行官尼瑪·加姆薩里持有該公司3.8%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前17名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Blend Labs

Blend Labs 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Blend Labs, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$46m worth of the US$819m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Blend Labs, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值8.19億美元的公司價值4600萬美元。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司43%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 19%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司擁有19%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Blend Labs better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Blend Labs .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解 Blend Labs,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在 Blend Labs 中發現的 3 個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論