share_log

Myers Industries (NYSE:MYE) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Myers Industries (NYSE:MYE) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

邁爾斯工業(紐約證券交易所代碼:MYE)似乎非常明智地使用債務
Simply Wall St ·  03/28 20:49

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Myers Industries, Inc. (NYSE:MYE) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,邁爾斯工業公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:MYE)也使用債務。但更重要的問題是:債務創造了多大的風險?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業難以償還債務,無論是新資本還是自由現金流。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司爲了控制債務,必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東。當然,許多公司使用債務爲增長提供資金,而不會產生任何負面影響。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,要做的第一件事是同時考慮其現金和債務。

What Is Myers Industries's Net Debt?

邁爾斯工業的淨負債是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Myers Industries had debt of US$58.0m at the end of December 2023, a reduction from US$94.0m over a year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$30.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$27.7m.

您可以點擊下圖查看更多詳情,該圖片顯示,截至2023年12月底,邁爾斯工業的債務爲5,800萬美元,較上一年的940萬美元有所減少。但是,由於其現金儲備爲3030萬美元,其淨負債較少,約爲2770萬美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:MYE Debt to Equity History March 28th 2024
紐約證券交易所:MYE 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 3 月 28 日

A Look At Myers Industries' Liabilities

看看邁爾斯工業的負債

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Myers Industries had liabilities of US$165.1m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$83.7m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$30.3m and US$128.6m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$89.9m.

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,邁爾斯工業的負債爲1.651億美元,一年後到期的負債爲8,370萬美元。另一方面,它有3030萬美元的現金和價值1.286億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額8,990萬美元。

Given Myers Industries has a market capitalization of US$856.1m, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

鑑於邁爾斯工業的市值爲8.561億美元,很難相信這些負債會構成很大的威脅。但是,我們確實認爲值得關注其資產負債表的實力,因爲它可能會隨着時間的推移而發生變化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),將其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。

Myers Industries has net debt of just 0.33 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 9.8 times the interest expense over the last year. It is just as well that Myers Industries's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 26% over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Myers Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

邁爾斯工業的淨負債僅爲息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的0.33倍,這表明它當然不是魯莽的借款人。這一觀點得到了穩健的利息覆蓋範圍的支持,息稅前利潤是去年利息支出的9.8倍。邁爾斯工業的負荷也不是太重,因爲其息稅前利潤比去年下降了26%。在還清債務方面,收入下降對健康的作用並不比含糖的蘇打水更有用。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定邁爾斯工業能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Myers Industries recorded free cash flow worth 71% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們總是檢查息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在最近三年中,鑑於自由現金流不包括利息和稅收,邁爾斯工業公司的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的71%,這幾乎是正常的。這種自由現金流使公司處於有利地位,可以在適當的時候償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Myers Industries's EBIT growth rate was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. There's no doubt that its ability to handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, is pretty flash. Considering this range of data points, we think Myers Industries is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Myers Industries, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

儘管我們考慮的其他因素要好得多,但根據這項分析,邁爾斯工業的息稅前利潤增長率確實爲負數。毫無疑問,根據息稅折舊攤銷前利潤,其處理債務的能力相當閃爍。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲邁爾斯工業完全有能力管理其債務水平。但要謹慎一點:我們認爲債務水平足夠高,足以證明持續監測是合理的。隨着時間的推移,股價往往會跟隨每股收益,因此,如果你對邁爾斯工業感興趣,你很可能想點擊這裏查看其每股收益歷史的互動圖表。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

當一切都說完之後,有時更容易將注意力集中在甚至不需要債務的公司上。讀者現在可以100%免費訪問淨負債爲零的成長型股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論