Toyota's Hybrids Or Tesla's Pure EVs? Expert Weighs In On Debate: 'Plug-Ins Are Better, Very Simply'
Toyota's Hybrids Or Tesla's Pure EVs? Expert Weighs In On Debate: 'Plug-Ins Are Better, Very Simply'
Gordon Johnson, CEO of GLJ Research, contrasted the affordability of plug-in hybrids to battery electric vehicles, spotlighting the cost benefits of the former.
What Happened: On Thursday, Johnson discussed the automotive industry's direction regarding electric vehicles (EVs) during CNBC's "Last Call." He pointed out the stark price difference between plug-in hybrids and battery electric vehicles (BEVs), comparing Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Toyota Motor Corporation (NYSE:TM) emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of plug-in hybrids.
"Toyota bet on basically plug-in hybrids. Tesla bet on pure electrics," Johnson stated.
"The cost of an average plug-in [is] $27K. The cost of an average BEV [is] $44K."
"Toyota bet on basically plug-in hybrids. Tesla bet on pure electrics," says @GordonJohnson19. "Here's why plug-ins are better, very simply. The cost of an average plug-in [is] $27K. The cost of an average BEV [is] $44K." $TSLA $TM pic.twitter.com/mOubEwRx76
— Last Call (@LastCallCNBC) March 25, 2024
Why It Matters: The conversation around EVs and plug-in hybrids is intensifying as the automotive industry evolves. Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, recently argued on the same CNBC segment that consumers are gravitating towards EVs, particularly due to the high performance of Tesla batteries.
Furthermore, a report by Atlas Public Policy suggests that owning an EV, like the Tesla Model Y, could be more economical over seven years compared to gas-powered vehicles such as the Toyota Highlander. This reinforces the notion that EVs may offer better long-term value despite higher initial costs.
Amid these discussions, Tesla has been adjusting its strategy which could lead to fewer vehicle deliveries but potentially higher profitability.
Price Action: As of Monday, Tesla's stock closed at $172.63 while Toyota saw its stock close at $252.41.
Gordon Johnson, CEO of GLJ Research, contrasted the affordability of plug-in hybrids to battery electric vehicles, spotlighting the cost benefits of the former.
GLJ Research首席執行官戈登·約翰遜將插電式混合動力車的可負擔性與電池電動汽車的負擔性進行了對比，重點介紹了前者的成本效益。
What Happened: On Thursday, Johnson discussed the automotive industry's direction regarding electric vehicles (EVs) during CNBC's "Last Call." He pointed out the stark price difference between plug-in hybrids and battery electric vehicles (BEVs), comparing Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Toyota Motor Corporation (NYSE:TM) emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of plug-in hybrids.
發生了什麼：週四，約翰遜在CNBC的 “最後一次通話” 中討論了汽車行業在電動汽車（EV）方面的方向。他指出了插電式混合動力車和電池電動汽車（BEV）之間的明顯價格差異，比較了特斯拉公司（納斯達克股票代碼：TSLA）和豐田汽車公司（紐約證券交易所代碼：TM），強調了插電式混合動力汽車的成本效益。
"Toyota bet on basically plug-in hybrids. Tesla bet on pure electrics," Johnson stated.
“豐田押注基本上是插電式混合動力車。特斯拉押注純電動汽車，” 約翰遜說。
"The cost of an average plug-in [is] $27K. The cost of an average BEV [is] $44K."
“插件的平均成本 [爲] 2.7萬美元。一輛普通電動汽車的成本 [是] 4.4萬美元。”
"Toyota bet on basically plug-in hybrids. Tesla bet on pure electrics," says @GordonJohnson19. "Here's why plug-ins are better, very simply. The cost of an average plug-in [is] $27K. The cost of an average BEV [is] $44K." $TSLA $TM pic.twitter.com/mOubEwRx76
— Last Call (@LastCallCNBC) March 25, 2024
“豐田押注基本上是插電式混合動力車。特斯拉押注純電動汽車，” @GordonJohnson19 說。“簡而言之，這就是插件更好的原因。插件的平均成本 [爲] 2.7萬美元。一輛普通電動汽車的成本 [是] 4.4萬美元。”$TSLA $TM pic.twitter.com/moubewr
— 最後一次通話 (@LastCallCNBC) 2024 年 3 月 25 日
Why It Matters: The conversation around EVs and plug-in hybrids is intensifying as the automotive industry evolves. Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, recently argued on the same CNBC segment that consumers are gravitating towards EVs, particularly due to the high performance of Tesla batteries.
爲何重要：隨着汽車行業的發展，圍繞電動汽車和插電式混合動力汽車的討論越來越激烈。格柏川崎財富與投資管理首席執行官羅斯·格伯最近在CNBC的同一個細分市場上辯稱，消費者傾向於電動汽車，特別是由於特斯拉電池的高性能。
Furthermore, a report by Atlas Public Policy suggests that owning an EV, like the Tesla Model Y, could be more economical over seven years compared to gas-powered vehicles such as the Toyota Highlander. This reinforces the notion that EVs may offer better long-term value despite higher initial costs.
此外，Atlas Public Policy的一份報告表明，與豐田漢蘭達等汽油動力汽車相比，擁有電動汽車，例如特斯拉Model Y，在七年內可能更經濟。這強化了這樣的觀念，即儘管初始成本較高，電動汽車仍可能提供更好的長期價值。
Amid these discussions, Tesla has been adjusting its strategy which could lead to fewer vehicle deliveries but potentially higher profitability.
在這些討論中，特斯拉一直在調整其戰略，這可能會減少汽車交付量，但可能提高盈利能力。
Price Action: As of Monday, Tesla's stock closed at $172.63 while Toyota saw its stock close at $252.41.
價格走勢：截至週一，特斯拉的股票收於172.63美元，而豐田的股票收於252.41美元。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。
風險及免責聲明
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用瀏覽器的分享功能，分享給你的好友吧