share_log

With 56% Ownership, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 56% Ownership, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BRK.A)擁有 56% 的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  03/25 23:47

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Berkshire Hathaway implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Berkshire Hathaway is 15%
  • 機構在伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 21 名股東持有
  • 伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的內部所有權爲15%

A look at the shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BRK.A)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲56%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Berkshire Hathaway, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BRK.A Ownership Breakdown March 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BRK.A 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Berkshire Hathaway?

關於伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Berkshire Hathaway already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Berkshire Hathaway, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BRK.A Earnings and Revenue Growth March 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BRK.A 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 25 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Berkshire Hathaway. The company's CEO Warren Buffett is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.9% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的股票不多。該公司首席執行官禾倫·巴菲特是最大股東,已發行股份的15%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.9%和4.9%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前21名公司擁有公司50%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Berkshire Hathaway

伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$891b, and insiders have US$137b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲8910億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1370億美元的股票。這非常重要。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Berkshire Hathaway. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有28%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Berkshire Hathaway , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司確定了1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論