share_log

Great Week for Tredegar Corporation (NYSE:TG) Institutional Investors After Losing 33% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Tredegar Corporation (NYSE:TG) Institutional Investors After Losing 33% Over the Previous Year

在去年下跌33%之后,Tredegar Corporation(纽约证券交易所代码:TG)机构投资者迎来了美好的一周
Simply Wall St ·  03/21 19:28

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Tredegar's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • 17% of Tredegar is held by insiders
  • 高机构所有权意味着Tredegar的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 51% 的业务由前6名股东持有
  • Tredegar 17% 的股份由内部人士持有

Every investor in Tredegar Corporation (NYSE:TG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Tredegar Corporation(纽约证券交易所代码:TG)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为62%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Last week's US$54m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 33% losses.

机构投资者可能会对上周的5400万美元市值收益表示赞赏,尤其是在经历了33%的亏损之后。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Tredegar.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Tredegar的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TG Ownership Breakdown March 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:TG 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tredegar?

关于Tredegar,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Tredegar does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Tredegar, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Tredegar确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Tredegar过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TG Earnings and Revenue Growth March 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:TG 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 21 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Tredegar is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is GAMCO Investors, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 7.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO John Steitz is the owner of 1.0% of the company's shares.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。Tredegar 不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是GAMCO Investors, Inc.,其已发行股票的14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约14%和7.1%的股份。此外,首席执行官约翰·施泰茨持有该公司1.0%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前六名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Tredegar

Tredegar 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Tredegar Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$178m, and insiders have US$30m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有Tredegar公司的大量股份。它的市值仅为1.78亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值3000万美元的股票。我们可以说这表明了与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然很小;一些内部人士可能已经创立了该公司。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司15%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.1%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司7.1%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Tredegar is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those make us uncomfortable...

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,Tredegar在我们的投资分析中显示了3个警告信号,其中2个使我们感到不舒服...

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发