share_log

Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 23% Reduction in Holdings Value

Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 23% Reduction in Holdings Value

阿特拉斯鋰業公司(納斯達克股票代碼:ATLX)首席執行官馬克·福加薩是該公司的最大股東,其持股價值下降了23%
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 20:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Atlas Lithium implies vested interests in company growth
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 對Atlas Lithium的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 51% 的業務由前三名股東持有
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 51% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

阿特拉斯鋰業公司(納斯達克股票代碼:ATLX)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。個人內部人士持有51%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$61m.

結果,在市值下降6100萬美元之後,內部人士作爲一個整體遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Atlas Lithium.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於阿特拉斯鋰業的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ATLX Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:ATLX 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Atlas Lithium?

關於阿特拉斯鋰業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Atlas Lithium. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Atlas Lithium, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者持有阿特拉斯鋰業的相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Atlas Lithium過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ATLX Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:ATLX 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 6 日

It would appear that 5.9% of Atlas Lithium shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. With a 39% stake, CEO Marc Fogassa is the largest shareholder. With 6.1% and 5.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Antonis Palikrousis and Waratah Capital Advisors Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

看來阿特拉斯鋰業有5.9%的股票由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。首席執行官馬克·福加薩持有39%的股份,是最大股東。安東尼斯·帕利克魯西斯和Waratah Capital Advisors Ltd.分別佔已發行股份的6.1%和5.9%,是第二和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前三名股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Atlas Lithium

阿特拉斯鋰業的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Atlas Lithium Corporation. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own US$102m worth of shares in the US$201m company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有阿特拉斯鋰業公司一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。這意味着他們擁有這家價值2.01億美元的公司價值1.02億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Atlas Lithium. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有35%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Atlas Lithium有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Atlas Lithium you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的4個Atlas Lithium警告信號,其中2個有點令人擔憂。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論