share_log

Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MFH) 57% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders

Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MFH) 57% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders

Mercurity 金融科技控股公司。”s(納斯達克股票代碼:MFH)上週上漲57%,使持有47%的個人投資者和內部人士受益
Simply Wall St ·  01/30 18:27

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Mercurity Fintech Holding by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders own 29% of Mercurity Fintech Holding
  • 個人投資者對Mercurity Fintech Holding的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前五名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 業內人士擁有水星金融科技控股公司29%的股份

Every investor in Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ:MFH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MFH)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有47%所有權的個人投資者。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$117m last week, while insiders who own 29% also benefitted.

上週市值觸及1.17億美元后,個人投資者漲幅最大,而持有29%的內部人士也從中受益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Mercurity Fintech Holding, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Mercurity Fintech Holding的每種所有者。

See our latest analysis for Mercurity Fintech Holding

查看我們對 Mercurity 金融科技控股公司的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:MFH Ownership Breakdown January 30th 2024
NasdaqCM:MFH 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 30 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mercurity Fintech Holding?

關於水星金融科技控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Mercurity Fintech Holding already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Mercurity Fintech Holding, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Mercurity Fintech Holding已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Mercurity Fintech Holding過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:MFH Earnings and Revenue Growth January 30th 2024
納斯達克公司:MFH 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 30 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Mercurity Fintech Holding. Apollo Multi Asset Management LLP is currently the largest shareholder, with 23% of shares outstanding. With 8.6% and 7.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hanqi Li and Hong Mei Zhou are the second and third largest shareholders.

對沖基金在 Mercurity Fintech Holding 中的股份不多。阿波羅多元資產管理有限責任公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的23%。李漢齊和周紅梅分別佔已發行股份的8.6%和7.6%,是第二和第三大股東。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前五名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Mercurity Fintech Holding

Mercurity 金融科技控股公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.. Insiders own US$34m worth of shares in the US$117m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc.合理比例的股份。內部人士擁有這家價值1.17億美元的公司價值3400萬美元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in Mercurity Fintech Holding. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有水星金融科技控股公司47%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Mercurity Fintech Holding better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Mercurity Fintech Holding that you should be aware of before investing here.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Mercurity Fintech控股公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了Mercurity Fintech Holding的兩個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,你應該注意這些信號。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論