share_log

With 49% Ownership, FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:EMLD) Has Piqued the Interest of Institutional Investors

With 49% Ownership, FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:EMLD) Has Piqued the Interest of Institutional Investors

FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp.(納斯達克股票代碼:EMLD)擁有49%的所有權,引起了機構投資者的興趣
Simply Wall St ·  01/25 21:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies FTAC Emerald Acquisition's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 5 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Insider ownership in FTAC Emerald Acquisition is 17%
  • 高機構所有權意味着FTAC Emerald Acquisition的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前五名股東擁有公司55%的股份
  • FTAC Emerald收購的內部所有權爲17%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:EMLD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp.(納斯達克股票代碼:EMLD),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲49%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about FTAC Emerald Acquisition.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關FTAC翡翠收購的哪些信息。

Check out our latest analysis for FTAC Emerald Acquisition

查看我們對FTAC翡翠收購的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:EMLD Ownership Breakdown January 25th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:EMLD 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FTAC Emerald Acquisition?

關於FTAC綠寶石的收購,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that FTAC Emerald Acquisition does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see FTAC Emerald Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,FTAC Emerald Acquisition確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到FTAC Emerald收購的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:EMLD Earnings and Revenue Growth January 25th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:EMLD 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 25 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in FTAC Emerald Acquisition. Emerald ESG Sponsor, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 17% and 7.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在FTAC綠寶石收購中持有的股份不多。Emerald ESG贊助商有限責任公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲17%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的17%和7.9%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前五名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of FTAC Emerald Acquisition

FTAC Emerald 收購的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in FTAC Emerald Acquisition Corp.. It has a market capitalization of just US$151m, and insiders have US$25m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有FTAC翡翠收購公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲1.51億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2500萬美元的股票。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold 9.1% stake in FTAC Emerald Acquisition, which represents a relatively small class of owners. We would usually expect a higher level of ownership by the general public. With such a small collective position, it may be difficult for small holders to influence the company.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有FTAC Emerald Acquisition9.1%的股份,該收購的所有者比例相對較小。我們通常期望公衆擁有更高的所有權水平。由於集體地位如此之小,小股東可能很難影響公司。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 7.9%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司擁有7.9%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 17%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司17%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果內部人士等關聯方對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for FTAC Emerald Acquisition that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了FTAC翡翠收購的3個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論