share_log

Private Companies Are Friend Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:605050) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥434m

Private Companies Are Friend Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:605050) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥434m

私營公司是朋友公司, Ltd. 's (SHSE: 605050) 最大的所有者,在市值下降4.34億元人民幣後受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  01/21 10:23

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • FriendLtd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 32% of FriendLtd is held by insiders
  • FriendLt擁有大量私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到公衆股東的影響
  • 51% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • FriendLtd 32% 的股份由內部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Friend Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:605050) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

來看看 Friend Co. 的股東, Ltd.(上海證券交易所代碼:605050)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲39%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Following a 7.2% decrease in the stock price last week, private companies suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 32% stock also took a hit.

繼上週股價下跌7.2%之後,私營公司遭受的損失最大,但擁有32%股票的內部人士也受到了打擊。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of FriendLtd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究FriendLtd的每種所有者。

View our latest analysis for FriendLtd

查看我們對 FriendLtd 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:605050 Ownership Breakdown January 21st 2024
SHSE: 605050 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FriendLtd?

關於FriendLTD,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Since institutions own only a small portion of FriendLtd, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

由於機構僅擁有FriendLtd的一小部分股份,因此許多機構可能沒有花太多時間考慮該股。但很明顯,有些人有;他們很喜歡它,足以買進。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。當一些大型機構想同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股價上漲。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的歷史可能有助於考慮是否會有更多的機構投資者想要這隻股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:605050 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 21st 2024
SHSE: 605050 2024 年 1 月 21 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in FriendLtd. Jianhua Cui is currently the company's largest shareholder with 26% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 25% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Jianbing Cui is the owner of 6.5% of the company's shares.

對沖基金在FriendLtd的股票不多。崔建華目前是公司的最大股東,已發行股份的26%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約25%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有9.1%的所有權。此外,首席執行官崔建兵持有公司6.5%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。分析師對該股的報道很少,但不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的空間。

Insider Ownership Of FriendLtd

FriendLtd 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Friend Co.,Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.8b stake in this CN¥5.6b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Friend Co的大量股份。,有限公司。內部人士在這項56億元的業務中持有18億元人民幣的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司24%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 39%, of the FriendLtd stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎擁有FriendLtd股票39%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for FriendLtd (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。比如風險。每家公司都有,我們發現了 FriendLTD 的 2 個警告信號(其中 1 個可能很嚴重!)你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論