share_log

HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Stock Price Dropped 6.1% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Stock Price Dropped 6.1% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

海航科技股份有限公司, Ltd. 's(SHSE: 600751)上週股價下跌6.1%;個人投資者不會感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  01/11 09:10

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • HNA TechnologyLtd's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 45% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
  • 16% of HNA TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
  • HNA TechnologyLtd擁有大量個人投資者,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 45% 的業務由前 18 名股東持有
  • 海航科技有限公司16%的股份由機構持有

Every investor in HNA Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600751) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

海航科技股份有限公司的每位投資者, Ltd.(上海證券交易所代碼:600751)應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲55%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 6.1% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌6.1%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HNA TechnologyLtd.

在下圖中,我們放大了海航科技有限公司的不同所有權組。

View our latest analysis for HNA TechnologyLtd

查看我們對海航科技有限公司的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600751 Ownership Breakdown January 11th 2024
SHSE: 600751 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HNA TechnologyLtd?

關於海航科技股份有限公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that HNA TechnologyLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see HNA TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,海航科技有限公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到海航科技有限公司的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600751 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 11th 2024
SHSE: 600751 2024 年 1 月 11 日收益和收入增長

HNA TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. CITIC Group Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 29% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 0.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

海航科技有限公司不歸對沖基金所有。中信集團公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的29%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的14%和0.7%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 18 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現18位最大股東共同擁有的股份登記冊不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of HNA TechnologyLtd

海航科技有限公司的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.

我們的數據無法證實董事會成員個人持有股份。並非所有司法管轄區在披露內部人所有權方面都有相同的規則,我們可能在這裏遺漏了一些東西。因此,您可以單擊此處了解有關首席執行官的更多信息。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 55% of HNA TechnologyLtd. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有海航科技有限公司55%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 29%, of the HNA TechnologyLtd stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎擁有海航科技有限公司29%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

許多人發現深入了解一家公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問過去的收入、收入和現金流的詳細圖表。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論