share_log

Lao Feng Xiang Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600612) Largest Shareholders Are State or Government With 42% Ownership, Individual Investors Own 41%

Lao Feng Xiang Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600612) Largest Shareholders Are State or Government With 42% Ownership, Individual Investors Own 41%

老鳳祥有限公司s (SHSE: 600612) 最大的股東是州或政府,擁有 42% 的所有權,個人投資者擁有 41%
Simply Wall St ·  01/05 13:42

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by state or government in Lao Feng Xiang indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 16% of Lao Feng Xiang is held by Institutions
  • 國家或政府在老鳳鄉擁有大量的所有權,這表明他們在管理和商業戰略中集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有7名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 16% 的老鳳祥股份由機構持有

Every investor in Lao Feng Xiang Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600612) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is state or government. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

老鳳祥股份有限公司(上海證券交易所股票代碼:600612)的每位投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是州或政府,準確地說約爲42%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 41% of the company's stockholders.

另一方面,個人投資者佔公司股東的41%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lao Feng Xiang.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於老鳳祥的什麼。

View our latest analysis for Lao Feng Xiang

查看我們對老鳳翔的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600612 Ownership Breakdown January 5th 2024
SHSE: 600612 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lao Feng Xiang?

關於老鳳翔,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。

We can see that Lao Feng Xiang does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lao Feng Xiang, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,老鳳祥確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下老鳳祥過去的收益軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600612 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 5th 2024
SHSE: 600612 2024 年 1 月 5 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lao Feng Xiang. State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of Shanghai Municipal Government is currently the company's largest shareholder with 42% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.3% and 1.4% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對老豐祥進行有意義的投資。上海市政府國有資產監督管理委員會目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的42%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約2.3%和1.4%的股份。

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前7名股東佔股份登記冊的一半以上,少數較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Lao Feng Xiang

老鳳祥的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Lao Feng Xiang Co., Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥1.1m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有老鳳祥股份有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能會通過我們尚未掌握的公司結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值110萬元人民幣的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 41% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司41%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定對他們有利,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lao Feng Xiang better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解老鳳翔,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細的圖表中找到歷史收入和收益。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論