share_log

Golden Agri-Resources Ltd's (SGX:E5H) Stock Price Dropped 3.7% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Golden Agri-Resources Ltd's (SGX:E5H) Stock Price Dropped 3.7% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

黃金農業資源有限公司(SGX: E5H)的股價上週下跌了3.7%;私營公司不會高興
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/22 06:42

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Golden Agri-Resources' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • PT Sinar Mas Group owns 51% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Golden Agri-Resources is 23%
  • Golden Agri-Resources擁有大量私有公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • PT Sinar Mas 集團擁有該公司 51% 的股份
  • 黃金農業資源的機構所有權爲23%

Every investor in Golden Agri-Resources Ltd (SGX:E5H) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 51% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

黃金農業資源有限公司(SGX: E5H)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。私人公司擁有51%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則虧損最大)。

And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 3.7%.

上週,私營公司遭受了最大的損失,股價下跌了3.7%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Golden Agri-Resources.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Golden Agri-Resources的哪些信息。

View our latest analysis for Golden Agri-Resources

查看我們對黃金農業資源的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SGX:E5H Ownership Breakdown November 21st 2023
新加坡證券交易所:E5H 所有權明細 2023 年 11 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Golden Agri-Resources?

關於黃金農業資源,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Golden Agri-Resources does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Golden Agri-Resources, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Golden Agri-Resources確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是,就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看黃金農業資源公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:E5H Earnings and Revenue Growth November 21st 2023
新加坡證券交易所:E5H收益和收入增長 2023年11月21日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Golden Agri-Resources. Our data shows that PT Sinar Mas Group is the largest shareholder with 51% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對黃金農業資源進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,PT Sinar Mas集團是最大的股東,擁有51%的已發行股份。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數股權控制權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的11%和5.4%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Golden Agri-Resources

黃金農業資源的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Golden Agri-Resources Ltd. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own S$144k worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Golden Agri-Resources Ltd.不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值14.4萬新元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣需要考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Golden Agri-Resources. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有黃金農業資源26%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決策向他們傾斜,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 51%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的51%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何粗略的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Golden Agri-Resources that you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經爲Golden Agri-Resources確定了3個警告信號,你應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論