share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Stifel Financial Corp.'s (NYSE:SF) Recent US$296m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Stifel Financial Corp.'s (NYSE:SF) Recent US$296m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構所有者可能會忽視 Stifel Financial Corps(紐約證券交易所代碼:SF)由於長期利潤保持盈利,近期市值下跌2.96億美元
Simply Wall St ·  2023/09/25 23:29

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Stifel Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Stifel Financial的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 15 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

Every investor in Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Stifel Financial Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SF)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東羣體。而佔據最大份額的集團是擁有83%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$296m last week. However, the 20% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週該公司的市值下跌2.96億美元后,機構投資者遭受的損失最大。但是,20%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的整體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Stifel Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Stifel Financial的每種類型的所有者。

See our latest analysis for Stifel Financial

查看我們對 Stifel Financial 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SF Ownership Breakdown September 25th 2023
紐約證券交易所:順豐所有權明細 2023年9月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stifel Financial?

關於Stifel Financial,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Stifel Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stifel Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Stifel Financial確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看Stifel Financial過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SF Earnings and Revenue Growth September 25th 2023
紐約證券交易所:順豐收益和收入增長 2023年9月25日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Stifel Financial is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.6% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 5.8% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Ronald Kruszewski directly holds 1.3% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以集體行使重大權力。Stifel Financial不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc. 是目前最大的股東,擁有10%的已發行股份。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有9.6%的普通股,資本研究與管理公司持有該公司約5.8%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官羅納德·克魯謝夫斯基直接持有已發行股票總額的1.3%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記處來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前15名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Stifel Financial

內部人士對 Stifel Financial

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Stifel Financial Corp.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$229m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到,內部人士擁有Stifel Financial Corp的股份。這是一家大公司,所以很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值2.29億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,還是值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Stifel Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同羣體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。 我們已經確定了 2 個警告信號 與 Stifel Financial 合作,了解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底 這是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者的表現如何。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論