CONX Corp. (NASDAQ:CONX) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 69% Ownership
CONX Corp. (NASDAQ:CONX) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 69% Ownership
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- CONX's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The largest shareholder of the company is Charles Ergen with a 69% stake
- 11% of CONX is held by Institutions
- CONX的大量內部所有權表明公司擴張具有固有的利益
- 該公司的最大股東是查爾斯·厄爾根,持有69%的股份
- 11% 的CONX股份由機構持有
A look at the shareholders of CONX Corp. (NASDAQ:CONX) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 69% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看CONX Corp.(納斯達克股票代碼:CONX)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,個人內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲69%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或損失最大)。
So it follows, every decision made by insiders of CONX regarding the company's future would be crucial to them.
因此,CONX內部人士就公司未來做出的每一項決定對他們都至關重要。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CONX.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於CONX的哪些信息。
See our latest analysis for CONX
查看我們對 CONX 的最新分析
![ownership-breakdown](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20230814/0-060dfc50e59c0b734f82f8fff8b2182b-0-0b5102ef515a5581667ccdf7663cbf1e.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CONX?
機構所有權告訴我們關於CONX的哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CONX. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CONX's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所見,機構投資者持有相當數量的CONX股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看CONX的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20230814/0-060dfc50e59c0b734f82f8fff8b2182b-1-e24ffe873f2277910a5418131d96c088.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CONX. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Charles Ergen (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 69% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 2.7% of the stock.
我們注意到,對沖基金對CONX沒有有意義的投資。根據我們的數據,我們推斷出最大的股東是查爾斯·厄爾根(Charles Ergen)(他還擁有最高關鍵高管的頭銜),已發行股份爲69%。當內部人士擁有公司的大量股份時,這通常被認爲是一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.5%和2.7%的股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of CONX
CONX 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該羣體中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of CONX Corp.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$153m stake in this US$222m business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有CONX Corp.一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。因此,他們在這家2.22億美元的業務中持有1.53億美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致。你可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CONX. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)擁有19%的所有權,對CONX有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for CONX that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同羣體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。例如,我們發現了 CONX 的 3 個警告標誌 在這裏投資之前,你應該注意這一點。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然 這可能不是最值得買的股票。所以來看看這個 免費的 免費的 有趣的公司名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。