share_log

Intchains Group Limited's (NASDAQ:ICG) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Qiang Ding, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 20% Last Week

Intchains Group Limited's (NASDAQ:ICG) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Qiang Ding, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 20% Last Week

Intchains Group Limited(納斯達克股票代碼:ICG)最看漲的內部人士是首席執行官丁強,上週他們的持股價值上漲了20%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/08/04 18:03

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Intchains Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 3 shareholders own 59% of the company
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 內部人士對Intchains Group的重大控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 前三名股東擁有公司59%的股份
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls Intchains Group Limited (NASDAQ:ICG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 77% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Intchains Group Limited(納斯達克股票代碼:ICG),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而佔據最大份額的集團是擁有77%所有權的個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$455m market cap following a 20% gain in the stock.

結果,上週業內人士得分最高,該公司在該股上漲20%後達到4.55億美元的市值。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Intchains Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Intchains Group的哪些信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Intchains Group

查看我們對 Intchains Group 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ICG Ownership Breakdown August 4th 2023
納斯達克股票代碼:ICG 所有權明細 2023 年 8 月 4 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Intchains Group?

關於Intchains集團,機構所有權的缺乏告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者通常會避開規模太小、流動性太差或風險太大的公司,不符合他們的口味。但是,看到沒有任何機構投資者的大型公司是不尋常的。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Intchains Group, for yourself, below.

沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能有很多。通常,新上市的小型公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。另一方面,專業投資者總是有可能避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲一家公司不是最賺錢的地方。機構投資者可能覺得該業務的歷史增長並不令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。您可以在下面親自查看Intchains Group過去的收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ICG Earnings and Revenue Growth August 4th 2023
納斯達克股票代碼:ICG 2023 年 8 月 4 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Intchains Group. The company's CEO Qiang Ding is the largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 14% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Chaohua Sheng is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在Intchains集團的股份不多。該公司首席執行官丁強是最大的股東,持有29%的已發行股份。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約15%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有14%的所有權。有趣的是,第三大股東盛超華也是董事會成員,這表明該公司主要股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Intchains Group

Intchains 集團的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Intchains Group Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own US$352m worth of shares in the US$455m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Intchains Group Limited的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以集體爲公司做出決策。這意味着他們擁有這家價值4.55億美元的公司價值3.52億美元的股份。這很有意義。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看那些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司12%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 10%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的10%。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Intchains Group better, we need to consider many other factors.

總是值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同羣體。但是要更好地了解Intchains Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡檢查一下 收入增長的歷史。你也可以,通過訪問這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表 詳細圖表

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然, 你可能會在其他地方找到一筆不錯的投資。 所以來看看這個 免費的 有趣的公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論