share_log

IFAST Corporation Ltd.'s (SGX:AIY) 7.7% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 51% as Well as Insiders

IFAST Corporation Ltd.'s (SGX:AIY) 7.7% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 51% as Well as Insiders

IFAST 集團有限公司's(SGX: AIY)上週上漲7.7% 既使持有51%的散戶投資者受益,也使內部人士受益
Simply Wall St ·  2023/06/15 15:06

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in iFAST indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 散戶投資者對iFast的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有25名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲49%
  • 內部人士最近買了

Every investor in iFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 51% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

iFast Corporation Ltd.(SGX: AIY)的每位投資者都應該瞭解最強大的股東羣體。散戶投資者擁有 51% 的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現下跌,則損失最大)。

While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 7.7% price gain, insiders also received a 30% cut.

儘管在上週價格上漲7.7%之後,散戶投資者是獲得最多收益的羣體,但內部人士也獲得了30%的削減。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of iFAST.

在下圖中,我們放大了iFast的不同所有權組。

See our latest analysis for iFAST

查看我們對 iFast 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SGX:AIY Ownership Breakdown June 15th 2023
新加坡交易所:AIY 所有權明細 2023 年 6 月 15 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iFAST?

關於iFast,機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that iFAST does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see iFAST's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,iFast確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所帶來的假定驗證。他們也是,有時候會錯的。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到iFast的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總會有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:AIY Earnings and Revenue Growth June 15th 2023
新加坡交易所:AIY 收益和收入增長 2023 年 6 月 15 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in iFAST. The company's CEO Chung Chun Lim is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 6.7% of the stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Wee Kian Lim is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在iFast的股份不多。該公司的首席執行官Chung Chun Lim是最大的股東,擁有20%的已發行股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約13%和6.7%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股東Wee Kian Lim也是董事會成員,這再次表明該公司的最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of iFAST

iFast 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of iFAST Corporation Ltd.. Insiders own S$405m worth of shares in the S$1.4b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有iFast Corporation Ltd的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家價值14億新元的公司價值4.05億新元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 51% of iFAST. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有iFast51%的股份。這種所有權水平使來自廣大公衆的投資者有一些權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 14%, of the iFAST stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看來私人公司擁有iFast股票的14%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私營公司對上市公司的股票感興趣。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand iFAST better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that iFAST is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

總值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同羣體。但是要更好地理解iFast,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意 iFast 正在顯示 我們的投資分析中有兩個警告信號 ,你應該知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底 這是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者的表現如何。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論