share_log

Individual Investors Who Own 45% Along With Institutions Invested in Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLDP) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Individual Investors Who Own 45% Along With Institutions Invested in Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLDP) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

持有45%的個人投資者以及投資Solid Power, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:SLDP)的機構上週的持股價值有所增加
Simply Wall St ·  2023/05/24 21:43

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Solid Power indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 個人投資者對Solid Power的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 前25名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 內部人士最近買了

Every investor in Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLDP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Solid Power, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:SLDP)的每位投資者都應該瞭解最強大的股東羣體。而佔據最大份額的集團是擁有45%所有權的個人投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現下跌,則損失最大)。

Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$407m last week, while institutions who own 30% also benefitted.

在上週市值觸及4.07億美元之後,個人投資者漲幅最大,而擁有30%的機構也從中受益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Solid Power.

在下圖中,我們放大了 Solid Power 的不同所有權組。

See our latest analysis for Solid Power

查看我們對 Solid Power 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SLDP Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2023
納斯達克集團:SLDP 所有權明細 2023 年 5 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Solid Power?

關於 Solid Power,機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Solid Power. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Solid Power, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者持有Solid Power的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所帶來的假定驗證。他們也是,有時候會錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看Solid Power過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SLDP Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2023
納斯達克集團:SLDP 收益和收入增長 2023 年 5 月 24 日

Solid Power is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Ford Motor Company, with ownership of 6.5%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that David Jansen, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.

Solid Power 不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是福特汽車公司,所有權爲6.5%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的5.9%和5.2%。此外,我們發現首席執行官戴維·詹森將0.9%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前25名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Solid Power

Solid Power 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該羣體中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Solid Power, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$32m worth of the US$407m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Solid Power, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值4.07億美元的公司價值3200萬美元。這至少顯示出一定的對齊情況。你可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司45%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定對他們有利,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 5.2% stake in Solid Power. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有Solid Power5.2%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中產生影響。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資不多。一段時間後,他們可能會尋求出售資本並將資本重新部署到其他地方。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 12% of Solid Power stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上市公司目前擁有Solid Power12%的股份。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略風險,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Solid Power has 4 warning signs (and 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) we think you should know about.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同羣體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以冒險爲例——Solid Power 有 4 個警告標誌 (還有 1 個對我們來說不太合適)我們認爲你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這篇文章 免費的 分析師預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論