With 62% Ownership of the Shares, Burtech Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:BRKH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 62% Ownership of the Shares, Burtech Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:BRKH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Burtech Acquisition's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構所有權居高不下意味着Burtech Acquisition的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 共有9名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
- 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現
A look at the shareholders of Burtech Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:BRKH) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看Burtech Acquisition Corp.(納斯達克股票代碼:BRKH)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而佔據最大份額的集團是擁有62%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或損失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Burtech Acquisition.
在下圖中,我們將重點介紹Burtech Acquisition的不同所有權類別。
View our latest analysis for Burtech Acquisition
查看我們對Burtech收購的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Burtech Acquisition?
關於收購 Burtech,機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Burtech Acquisition. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Burtech Acquisition, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所見,機構投資者在Burtech收購中有相當多的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看Burtech收購公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.7% of Burtech Acquisition. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that BurTech LP LLC is the largest shareholder with 24% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.2% by the third-largest shareholder.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有Burtech收購6.7%的股份。值得注意的是,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。我們的數據顯示,BurTech LP LLC是最大的股東,已發行股票佔24%。就上下文而言,第二大股東持有約6.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東擁有3.2%的所有權。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現9位大股東約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。
Insider Ownership Of Burtech Acquisition
收購 Burtech 的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我們注意到,我們的數據並未顯示任何董事會成員個人持有股份。董事會成員不持有至少部分個人持股的情況很少見,因此我們的數據可能存在缺陷。一個不錯的下一步是檢查首席執行官的薪水是多少。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 7.6% stake, and are a relatively minor group of shareholders in Burtech Acquisition. We'd generally expect to see a higher level of ownership by the general public, than this. It's not too concerning, but it is worth noting that retail investors might struggle to influence board decisions.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有7.6%的股份,在Burtech Acquisition中佔相對較小的股東羣體。我們通常預計公衆的所有權水平會比這更高。這並不太令人擔憂,但值得注意的是,散戶投資者可能難以影響董事會的決策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 24%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司24%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Burtech Acquisition (2 make us uncomfortable) that you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了 收購 Burtech 的 3 個警告信號 (2 讓我們感到不舒服),您應該注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然 這可能不是最值得買的股票。所以來看看這個 免費的 免費的 有趣的公司名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。