share_log

Positive Week for EBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) Institutional Investors Who Lost 20% Over the Past Year

Positive Week for EBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) Institutional Investors Who Lost 20% Over the Past Year

積極的一周為 eBay 公司(NASDAQ:EBAY)機構投資者在過去一年中損失了 20%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/03/22 21:26

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies eBay's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 顯著較高的機構所有權意味著 eBay 的股價對他們的交易行為敏感
  • 前 21 名股東擁有公司 50% 的股東
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於對股票中的機會有很好的了解

If you want to know who really controls eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制 eBay 公司(NASDAQ:EBAY),那麼您必須查看其股份註冊處的構成。擁有 89% 的股份,機構擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團從對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最多)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 7.2% increase in share prices after a year of 20% losses as a sign that returns are likely to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲 7.2%,經過一年虧損 20%,這表明回報可能會開始走高。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about eBay.

讓我們仔細看看,看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關 eBay 的信息。

Check out our latest analysis for eBay

看看我們最新的 eBay 分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:EBAY Ownership Breakdown March 22nd 2023
新增:易趣所有權明細三月 22 日 2023

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About eBay?

機構擁有權告訴我們關於 eBay 的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似本地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常更加關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in eBay. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see eBay's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在 eBay 擁有相當數量的股份。這意味著為這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯的。當多個機構擁有一個股票時,他們總有處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競爭快速出售股票。在沒有增長歷史的公司中,這種風險較高。你可以在下面看到 eBay 的歷史收入和收入,但請記住,總是有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:EBAY Earnings and Revenue Growth March 22nd 2023
新增:易趣收入和收入增長 2023 年 3 月 22 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in eBay. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有超過 50% 的公司,所以在一起可能會強烈影響董事會決策。對沖基金在 eBay 上沒有很多股票。領航集團公司目前是該公司最大的股東,擁有 11% 的流通股份。就上下文而言,第二大股東持有約 8.5% 的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東擁有 4.3% 的所有權。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記處看,我們可以看到 50% 的所有權由前 21 名股東控制,這意味著沒有單一股東對所有權擁有多數權益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以為您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有一個合理數量的分析師覆蓋股票,所以它可能是有用的,找出他們對未來的總觀點。

Insider Ownership Of eBay

易趣的內幕所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層運行的業務,但 CEO 會回答董事會,即使他或她是它的成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內幕所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,其他股東更難以讓董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that eBay Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$62m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,eBay Inc. 內部人士擁有 1% 以下的公司。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有公司的很大比例會令人驚訝。雖然他們的持有量少於 1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值 62 億美元的股票(按當時價格計算)。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是否一直在購買或出售會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公共所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大眾-包括散戶投資者-擁有公司的 11% 股份,因此不容易忽視。雖然這種規模的擁有權可能不足以影響他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - eBay has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

我覺得看看誰確切擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。以風險為例-易趣有 1 警告標誌 我們認為您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能要考慮一下這家公司是否會成長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去 12 個月的數據計算的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一個日期的 12 個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?關注內容? 取得聯繫 直接與我們聯繫。 或者,通過電子郵件發送電子郵件給編輯團隊。
這篇文章由簡單牆聖是一般性質. 我們僅使用公正的方法,根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。 它並不構成購買或出售任何股票的建議,也不會考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本數據驅動的長期集中分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡易華街在提及的任何股票中都沒有倉位。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論