share_log

IFAST Corporation Ltd.'s (SGX:AIY) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chung Chun Lim Sees Holdings Value Fall by 11% Following Recent Drop

IFAST Corporation Ltd.'s (SGX:AIY) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chung Chun Lim Sees Holdings Value Fall by 11% Following Recent Drop

毅豐股份有限公司 's (新加坡交易所:AIY) 最大股東兼首席執行官鍾振廉看到控股價值下跌 11%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/17 06:45

A look at the shareholders of iFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 31% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看iFAST Corporation Ltd.(SGX:AIY)的股東就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。而持有這塊蛋糕最大份額的是擁有31%股權的個人內部人士。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

And following last week's 11% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌11%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of iFAST, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究iFAST的每種類型的所有者。

View our latest analysis for iFAST

查看我們對iFAST的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SGX:AIY Ownership Breakdown January 16th 2023
新交所:AIY所有權明細2023年1月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iFAST?

關於iFAST,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in iFAST. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see iFAST's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在iFAST擁有相當多的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到iFAST的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:AIY Earnings and Revenue Growth January 16th 2023
新交所:2023年1月16日AIY收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in iFAST. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chung Chun Lim with 20% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 13%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對衝基金在iFAST持有的股份並不多。從我們的數據可以看到,最大的股東是擁有20%流通股的首席執行官鍾俊林。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有14%和13%的流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四大股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着這個羣體對公司的決策有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。相當多的分析師追蹤這隻股票,所以你可以很容易地研究預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of iFAST

IFAST的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in iFAST Corporation Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful S$486m stake in this S$1.6b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息顯示,內部人士持有iFAST Corporation Ltd.的大量股份。非常有趣的是,內部人士在這項16億新元的業務中持有4.86億新元的可觀股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in iFAST. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有iFAST 30%的股份。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 15%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有15%的已發行股份。或許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對這些私營公司中的一家有利害關係,則應在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with iFAST .

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。為此,您應該意識到2個警告標誌我們已經發現了iFAST。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能會想一想這家公司是會增長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份顯示分析師對其未來預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論