share_log

MW UPDATE: 5 smart ways to buy bonds and stabilize your portfolio

MW UPDATE: 5 smart ways to buy bonds and stabilize your portfolio

MW更新:購買債券和穩定投資組合的5個聰明方法
道琼斯 ·  2018/12/06 22:06

MW UPDATE: 5 smart ways to buy bonds and stabilize your portfolio

MW更新:購買債券和穩定投資組合的5個聰明方法

By Jeff Reeves, MarketWatch

作者:傑夫·裏夫斯(Jeff Reeves),MarketWatch

A pitch for bonds may sound insane, but this isn't the usual approach

推銷債券聽起來可能很瘋狂,但這不是通常的做法

Over the last few years, diversification has become a dirty word on Wall Street. Amid consistent outperformance for large-cap tech stocks and a steady grind higher for "risk-on" equities in general, many investors have been conditioned to rely on a select group stocks and ignore the rest.

在過去的幾年裏,多元化已經成為華爾街的一個污言穢語。在大型科技股持續表現優異,以及“風險”股票整體穩步走高的背景下,許多投資者已習慣於依賴於精選的集團股票,而忽視其餘股票。

Heck, it's hard to shake that logic even now. While tech darlings Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Facebook Inc. (FB) are both down approximately 20% in the last three months, a longer-term look shows the pair are leaving the rest of Wall Street in the dust; Apple is up 120% in the last five years vs. just 50% or so for the S&P 500 . Facebook stock is up an impressive 190% to lap the S&P almost four times over.

見鬼,即使是現在也很難動搖這一邏輯。儘管科技寵兒蘋果公司(Apple Inc.)和Facebook公司(Facebook Inc.)在過去三個月都下跌了約20%,但從更長期的角度來看,這兩家公司的表現令華爾街其他公司相形見絀;蘋果公司在過去五年中上漲了120%,而標準普爾500指數(S&P500)的漲幅僅為50%左右。Facebook股價令人印象深刻地上漲了190%,幾乎是標準普爾指數的四倍。

But history shows fashionable investment ideas are rarely durable ones. And as the stock market gets choppy and old favorites show signs of weakness, it's worth wondering whether it's time to get back to basics and embrace diversification -- both across sectors as well as a cross asset classes.

但歷史表明,時髦的投資理念很少是持久的。隨着股市的震盪和過去最受歡迎的股票顯示出疲軟跡象,我們有必要思考,是否是時候回到基本點,擁抱多元化--無論是跨行業的,還是跨資產類別的。

That means taking a serious look at bonds as we enter 2019.

這意味着當我們進入2019年時,要認真看待債券。

I know, the pitch for bonds may sound insane to some. After all, the Fed is clearly on a path to a fed-funds rate as growth remains strong and inflation creeps higher, and bond values typically drop as interest rates rise. And furthermore, overall bond yields remain quite anemic from a historic perspective; while many have been gaga over 10-year Treasury yields edging north of 3%, the average yield on the 10-year over the last 30 years is actually north of 6%.

我知道,對一些人來説,發行債券聽起來可能很瘋狂。畢竟,美聯儲顯然正走在聯邦基金利率的道路上,因為經濟增長依然強勁,通脹緩慢攀升,債券價值通常會隨着利率的上升而下降。此外,從歷史的角度來看,整體債券收益率仍然相當疲軟;儘管許多人對10年期美國國債收益率小幅超過3%感到興奮,但過去30年的10年期國債平均收益率實際上是在6%以上。

But investors should not forget that bonds are a crucial tool in a well-rounded portfolio. A few unique bond strategies are actually doing pretty well right now -- and perhaps are poised for even bigger success in the New Year.

但投資者不應忘記,在一個全面的投資組合中,債券是一個至關重要的工具。一些獨特的債券策略現在實際上表現得相當不錯--也許在新的一年裏會取得更大的成功。

Here are five tactical bond strategies to round out your portfolio and provide stability in this choppy market.

以下是五種戰術債券策略,可以完善你的投資組合,並在這個動盪的市場中提供穩定。

Unconstrained bond funds

不受約束的債券基金

Let's start with an incredibly unfashionable idea: a mutual fund with above-average fees, actively managing its portfolio. Investors who strongly believe active management is a net negative overall and prefer the rock-bottom fee structure of indexed ETFs may be aghast at this idea, but hear me out.

讓我們從一個令人難以置信的不合時宜的想法開始:一隻費用高於平均水平的共同基金,積極管理其投資組合。投資者強烈認為,主動管理總體上是淨負面的,他們更喜歡指數化ETF的最低收費結構,他們可能會對這個想法感到震驚,但請聽我説完。

Index funds are necessarily rigid and that's a bad strategy in a rising rate environment if you're on the wrong side of the trade. Just look at megafunds like the $53 billion iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) that has lost about 4% in the last 12 months of rate tightening as proof, or the popular iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), which has lost about 9% in the same period.

指數基金必然是僵化的,如果你站在交易的錯誤一邊,這在利率上升的環境下是一個糟糕的策略。看看530億美元的iShares Core U.S.Aggregate Bond ETF(AGG)和廣受歡迎的iShares 20年以上國債ETF(TLT)等巨型基金就可以證明這一點。過去12個月,iShares Core U.S.Aggregate Bond ETF(AGG)的損失約為4%,而廣受歡迎的iShares 20年以上國債ETF(TLT)的同期損失約為9%。

Unconstrained bond funds have the flexibility to avoid the most troubled parts of the bond market, such as longer-dated U.S. government bonds, and seek out opportunities where they find it.

不受約束的債券基金具有靈活性,可以避開債券市場最麻煩的部分,比如較長期的美國政府債券,並在找到機會的地方尋找機會。

Take the Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund as a prime example. It has held tough with a decline of less than 2%, all while offering a yield of about 3.5% while both of the aforementioned ETFs offer under 3.0%. That shows the power of an active, unconstrained bond strategy right now, and more than offsets this fund's comparatively higher fee structure.

以古根海姆宏觀機遇基金(Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund)為例。它一直堅挺,跌幅不到2%,同時提供約3.5%的收益率,而上述兩隻ETF的收益率都低於3.0%。這顯示了目前積極、不受約束的債券策略的力量,遠遠抵消了該基金相對較高的費用結構。

Short-term corporate bonds

短期公司債券

If you simply can't stomach this old-school concept, then consider an index fund that is more appropriate for the current environment. Namely, shorten your duration and increase your yield with investment-grade corporate bonds that pay a bit more than T-notes but don't have the big risks of junk.

如果你根本無法忍受這個老派的概念,那就考慮一隻更適合當前環境的指數基金。也就是説,縮短你的存續期,提高你的收益率,投資級別的公司債券的收益率略高於美國國債,但沒有垃圾債券的大風險。

There are plenty of funds out there like this, but one of the most popular is the Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH), an ETF that focuses on investment grade bonds with a duration of 1 to 5 years. We're talking about loans to megacaps that aren't likely to default, including Bank of America (BAC), Apple and Verizon (VZ).

像這樣的基金有很多,但最受歡迎的是先鋒短期公司債券ETF(VCSH),這是一隻專注於1至5年存續期的投資級債券的ETF。我們談論的是向不太可能違約的巨型銀行提供的貸款,包括美國銀行(Bank Of America)、蘋果(Apple)和威瑞森(Verizon)。

The 30-day yield of 3.7 % is much better than that of those popular but underperforming ETFs I flagged earlier, and as is typical for a Vanguard index fund the ETF is dirt cheap at 0.07% in fees or just $7 annually on every $10,000 invested.

3.7%的30天收益率比我早些時候提到的那些廣受歡迎但表現不佳的ETF要好得多,而且就像先鋒指數基金(Vanguard Index Fund)的典型做法一樣,ETF非常便宜,手續費只有0.07%,或者每投資10,000美元,每年只有7美元。

TIPS

小貼士

Treasury Inflation Protected Securities got a bad rap during the Great Recession. That's because at times TIPS bonds had sold with negative yields to maturity, since the asset is benchmarked to the Consumer Price Index and the market's inflation fears were a bit overdone.

美國國債通脹保值證券在大衰退期間聲名狼藉。這是因為TIPS債券有時會以負收益率出售到到期,因為這項資產是以消費者價格指數(CPI)為基準的,而市場對通脹的擔憂有點過頭了。

But the situation has changed a great deal now that were are roughly a decade removed from the financial crisis. Inflation is up across the board, including higher wages and rents, and data in November showed the Consumer Price Index rising at a 2.5% annual rate. That's above the Fed's 2.0% target, and a big reason rates have been creeping higher in the last few years.

但現在情況已經發生了很大變化,我們距離金融危機大約有十年的時間了。通貨膨脹率全面上升,包括工資和租金的上漲,11月份的數據顯示,消費者價格指數(CPI)按年率計算上漲了2.5%。這高於美聯儲2.0%的目標,這也是過去幾年利率一直在攀升的一個重要原因。

If you want to play this near-term inflation trend, then consider fund like the iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). With shorter-duration TIPS as its holdings, you don't need to worry about the long-term prospects of inflation and simply can capitalize on the stability of these bonds and the uptrend in current consumer prices. A 30-day yield of 2.5% and the prospect of better returns as inflation rises makes this fund a decent tactical bet if you want to branch out into bonds.

如果你想玩這種短期通脹趨勢,那麼可以考慮像iShares 0-5年TIPS債券ETF(STIP)這樣的基金。持有期限較短的TIPS,你不必擔心通脹的長期前景,只需利用這些債券的穩定性和當前消費價格的上升趨勢即可。30天期2.5%的收益率,以及隨着通脹上升而獲得更好回報的前景,使這隻基金成為你想要擴展到債券領域的一個不錯的戰術賭注。

Laddered bonds

階梯式債券

We've discussed ways to mitigate interest rate risk via active management and shorter duration, but it's important to acknowledge that any potential loss in bond principal is only realized if and when bonds are sold. If you hold your bond to maturity, you actually get the face value of the bond back and never have to worry about selling at a discount on the open market.

我們已經討論了通過積極管理和縮短存續期來緩解利率風險的方法,但重要的是要承認,只有在債券出售的情況下,債券本金的任何潛在損失才會實現。如果你持有債券到到期日,你實際上就能拿回債券的面值,再也不用擔心在公開市場上打折出售了。

You can do this through individual bond purchases on your own, but some investors are leery of simply buying and holding a few long-term bonds to maturity. Aside from liquidity concerns, there are also reasons to fret about making an ill-timed purchase in a small number of bonds as rates march higher.

你可以自己通過購買個人債券來做到這一點,但一些投資者對簡單地購買並持有幾隻長期債券到到期持謹慎態度。除了流動性方面的擔憂,隨着利率走高,人們也有理由擔心購買少量債券的時機不合時宜。

However, "laddering" your bonds by staggering their maturities can help. This strategy involves rolling maturities that allow a few bonds to mature each year, allowing for steady reinvestment to mitigate interest rate risk.

然而,通過錯開到期日來“梯級”你的債券可能會有所幫助。這一戰略包括滾動到期日,每年允許少數債券到期,允許穩定的再投資以緩解利率風險。

If you like this concept of laddering your bonds in theory but are intimidated by putting the strategy into practice, consider the Invesco LadderRite 0-5 Year Corporate Bond Portfolio (LDRI) as a tool. The fund does have a small amount of turnover -- and charges a nominal expense of 0.22% or $22 annually on every $10,000 invested -- so the fund isn't perfectly flat in principal value and is down about 2% in the last 12 months. However, it is much more stable than the popular bond ETFs out there and yields a nice 3.3% at present.

如果你在理論上喜歡這種債券階梯的概念,但在實踐中被嚇倒了,可以考慮將景順0-5年期公司債券投資組合(LDRI)作為一種工具。該基金的營業額很小,每投資10,000美元,每年收取0.22%或22美元的名義費用,因此該基金的本金並非完全持平,過去12個月下跌了約2%。然而,它比目前流行的債券ETF要穩定得多,目前收益率高達3.3%。

Situational bond funds

情景債券基金

Some investors may think the right approach to bonds involves some combination of the strategies above. Others may find the strategies academically interesting as short-term plays, but questionable as long-term holdings. If either of these descriptions include your personal point of view, than allow me to offer up some of the more arcane bond funds out there that are tailor-made for the current moment and rising rate environment.

一些投資者可能認為正確的債券策略包括上述策略的某種組合。其他人可能會發現,這些策略作為短期投資在學術上很有趣,但作為長期持有卻有問題。如果這兩種描述中的任何一種都包含了你的個人觀點,那麼請允許我提供一些更神祕的債券基金,這些基金是為當前的時刻和利率上升環境量身定做的。

First, there's the Sit Rising Rate ETF (RISE) that uses derivatives to bet against long-term Treasury bonds. Think of it as an inverse bond ETF, as evidenced by the fact that this fund has increased in value 5% or so in the last 12 months as the typical diversified bond fund has suffered.

首先,是SIT上升利率ETF(Rise),它利用衍生品做空長期國債。可以把它想象成一隻反向債券ETF,這一事實證明了這隻基金在過去12個月裏增值了5%左右,就像典型的多元化債券基金所遭受的那樣。

A very different example of a tactical bond fund would be the ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF), which takes the already stodgy strategy of TIPS and makes it even more of a defensive play -- which is quite a feat. This ETF uses swaps to hedge against possible rate declines, and is tailored to a 30-year view on inflation data instead of short-term rate fluctuations to further smooth out volatility. You won't see much in regards to total return here, with very stable principal values and a modest yield of about 2.8%, but you certainly will have peace of mind.

戰術債券基金的一個非常不同的例子是ProShares通脹預期ETF(ProShares Inflation Performance ETF),它採用了TIPS本已乏善可陳的策略,使其更具防禦性--這是一項相當了不起的壯舉。這隻ETF使用掉期來對衝可能的利率下降,並針對通脹數據(而不是短期利率波動)的30年視角進行了量身定做,以進一步平息波動。你在這裏不會看到太多關於總回報的東西,本金非常穩定,收益率適度在2.8%左右,但你肯定會安心。

The challenge of funds like the Sit Rising Rate ETF (RISE)and the ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF)is that they necessarily depend on unique conditions and a measure of market timing to provide true outperformance. But if you think the conditions are right in 2019 to use either as a short-term profit center or simply as a hedge, either could help diversify your portfolio away from the typical stock or bond funds you're used to.

像SIT上升利率ETF(Rise)和ProShares通脹預期ETF(RINF)這樣的基金面臨的挑戰是,它們必須依靠獨特的條件和市場時機的衡量來提供真正的優異表現。但如果你認為2019年的條件合適,既可以作為短期利潤中心,也可以簡單地作為對衝工具,這兩者都可以幫助你的投資組合多樣化,而不是你習慣的典型的股票或債券基金。

-Jeff Reeves; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com

-傑夫·裏夫斯(Jeff Reeves);電話:415-439-6400;電子郵件:AskNewswres@dowjones.com

RELATED: Howard Gold: The stock market made President Trump and the Fed's Powell blink (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-stock-market-made-president-trump-and-the-feds-powell-blink-2018-12-04)

相關:霍華德黃金:股市令特朗普總統和美聯儲鮑威爾眨眼(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-stock-market-made-president-trump-and-the-feds-powell-blink-2018-12-04)

RELATED: Mark Hulbert: Stocks are twice as likely to finish 2019 with a gain than a loss (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-why-stocks-will-likely-be-higher-at-the-end-of-2019-2018-12-04)

相關:馬克·胡爾伯特:股市在2019年結束時獲利的可能性是虧損的兩倍(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-why-stocks-will-likely-be-higher-at-the-end-of-2019-2018-12-04)

RELATED: Goldman: Tech growth stocks are most expensive relative to value since the 2000 bubble (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-tech-growth-stocks-are-most-expensive-relative-to-value-since-the-2000-bubble-2018-12-03)

相關:高盛:科技成長股相對於價值是自2000年泡沫(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-tech-growth-stocks-are-most-expensive-relative-to-value-since-the-2000-bubble-2018-12-03)以來最昂貴的



(END) Dow Jones Newswires

(完)道瓊通訊社

December 06, 2018 09:06 ET (14:06 GMT)

2018年12月6日東部時間09:06(格林尼治標準時間14:06)

Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

版權所有(C)2018年道瓊斯公司

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論