share_log

How Much Of SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE:S) Do Institutions Own?

How Much Of SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE:S) Do Institutions Own?

機構持有多少SentinelOne,Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:S)的股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/26 23:15

The big shareholder groups in SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE:S) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

SentinelOne,Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:S)的大股東集團擁有對公司的控制權。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。我們還傾向於看到,以前為公眾所有的公司的內部人持股比例較低。

SentinelOne has a market capitalization of US$7.4b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. In the chart below, we can see that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about SentinelOne.

SentinelOne的市值為74億美元,所以它太大了,不能在雷達下飛行。我們預計,機構投資者和散户投資者都將擁有該公司的部分股權。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到機構擁有該公司的股份。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以發現更多關於SentinelOne的信息。

View our latest analysis for SentinelOne

查看我們對SentinelOne的最新分析

NYSE:S Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2022
紐約證券交易所:2022年6月26日S所有權明細

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SentinelOne?

關於哨兵一號,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

We can see that SentinelOne does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at SentinelOne's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,SentinelOne確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,下面是SentinelOne的盈利歷史,值得一看。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

NYSE:S Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2022
紐約證券交易所:2022年6月26日收益和收入增長

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 7.8% of SentinelOne. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Insight Venture Management, LLC is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 9.1% and 7.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and Third Point LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Tomer Weingarten is the owner of 1.8% of the company's shares.

我們的數據顯示,對衝基金持有SentinelOne 7.8%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因為對衝基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來為股東創造短期價值的變化。我們的數據顯示,Insight Venture Management,LLC是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。T.Rowe Price Group,Inc.和Third Point LLC分別持有9.1%和7.8%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股東。此外,首席執行官託默·韋因加滕還持有該公司1.8%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了更多的挖掘,發現大股東中有8個約佔登記的51%,這意味着除了大股東之外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of SentinelOne

SentinelOne的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

We can see that insiders own shares in SentinelOne, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$189m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到,內部人士持有SentinelOne,Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值1.89億美元的可觀股份。大多數人會認為這是一個真正的積極因素。看到內部人士的投資達到這樣的水平是件好事。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in SentinelOne. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有SentinelOne 23%的股份。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in SentinelOne. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有SentinelOne 19%的股份。這表明,他們可以在關鍵的政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因為私人股本有時能夠鼓勵有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有者可能會在投資上市後退出。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for SentinelOne you should know about.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮一下風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現哨兵一號的2個警告標誌你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能會想一想這家公司是會增長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份顯示分析師對其未來預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論