share_log

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In PCCW Limited (HKG:8)?

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In PCCW Limited (HKG:8)?

內部人士是否持有電訊盈科有限公司(HKG:8)的大量股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/08 10:24

The big shareholder groups in PCCW Limited (HKG:8) have power over the company.  Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.   I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

電訊盈科有限公司(HKG:8)的大股東集團擁有對公司的控制權。大公司通常有機構作為股東,我們通常會看到內部人士持有小公司的股份。我非常希望看到至少有一點內部人持股。正如查理·芒格所説,給我看激勵措施,我就會告訴你結果。

PCCW has a market capitalization of HK$35b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company.   Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that   institutions are noticeable on the share registry.   Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PCCW.

電訊盈科的市值為350億港元,所以它太大了,不能低調行事。我們預計,機構投資者和散户投資者都將擁有該公司的部分股權。我們對公司所有權的分析如下所示,機構在股票登記處是顯而易見的。讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於電訊盈科的信息。

View our latest analysis for PCCW

查看我們對電訊盈科的最新分析

SEHK:8 Ownership Breakdown April 7th 2022

聯交所:8所有權分類2022年4月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PCCW?

關於電訊盈科,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PCCW.  This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong.  If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at PCCW's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在電訊盈科持有相當多的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得一看的是電訊盈科的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

SEHK:8 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 7th 2022

聯交所:8盈利及收入增長2022年4月7日

PCCW is not owned by hedge funds.      Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding.        In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 18% and 6.0% of the stock.     Tzar Kai Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

電訊盈科並非由對衝基金所有。盈科區域發展有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,持有23%的流通股。相比之下,第二大股東和第三大股東分別持有約18%和6.0%的股份。身為第三大股東的李澤楷,亦恰好擔任董事局主席。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現,前5名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着這一羣體對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments.   Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。相當多的分析師追蹤這隻股票,所以你可以很容易地研究預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of PCCW

電訊盈科的內部人士所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count.  Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in PCCW Limited.   The insiders have a meaningful stake worth HK$2.1b. Most would see this as a real positive.  If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can  click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告,內部人士確實持有電訊盈科有限公司的股份。內部人士持有價值21億港元的可觀股份。大多數人會認為這是一個真正的積極因素。如果你想探討內部人結盟的問題,你可以點擊這裏,看看內部人是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 42% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over PCCW.  While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有電訊盈科42%股權的公眾(主要是個人投資者)對電訊盈科有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 41% of PCCW stock.   This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

上市公司目前持有電訊盈科41%的股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。這可能是因為它們已經解體。這一持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PCCW better, we need to consider many other factors.    Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk.   We've identified 2 warning signs  with PCCW (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored)  , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但為了更好地理解電訊盈科,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮一下無處不在的投資風險幽靈。我們已經確定了電訊盈科的兩個警告信號(至少有一個不應被忽視),瞭解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論