share_log

Here's What PropTech Investment Corporation II's (NASDAQ:PTIC) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like

Here's What PropTech Investment Corporation II's (NASDAQ:PTIC) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like

以下是Proptech投資公司II(納斯達克股票代碼:PTIC)的股東股權結構
Simply Wall St. ·  2021/08/17 23:47

If you want to know who really controls PropTech Investment Corporation II (NASDAQ:PTIC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Proptech Investment Corporation II(納斯達克:PTIC),那麼您將不得不查看其共享註冊表的構成。大公司通常有機構作為股東,我們通常會看到內部人士持有小公司的股份。過去屬於公眾所有的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股比例。

PropTech Investment Corporation II is a smaller company with a market capitalization of US$279m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about PropTech Investment Corporation II.

Proptech Investment Corporation II是一家規模較小的公司,市值為2.79億美元,因此它可能仍在許多機構投資者的雷達下飛行。看看我們關於所有權分組的數據(如下),似乎機構在股票登記處是顯而易見的。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以更多地瞭解Proptech投資公司II。

View our latest analysis for PropTech Investment Corporation IINasdaqCM:PTIC Ownership Breakdown August 17th 2021What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PropTech Investment Corporation II?

查看我們對Proptech Investment Corporation IINasdaqCM的最新分析:PTIC所有權明細2021年8月17日關於Proptech投資公司II,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PropTech Investment Corporation II. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PropTech Investment Corporation II, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.NasdaqCM:PTIC Earnings and Revenue Growth August 17th 2021

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Proptech投資公司II持有相當多的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師看過這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,查看Proptech Investment Corporation II過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。納斯達克CM:PTIC收益和收入增長2021年8月17日

It would appear that 11% of PropTech Investment Corporation II shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is HC PropTech Partners II LLC with 19% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

看來Proptech Investment Corporation II有11%的股份由對衝基金控制。這引起了我的注意,因為對衝基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來為股東創造短期價值的變化。看看我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是HC Proptech Partners II LLC,持有19%的流通股。作為背景,第二大股東持有約5.5%的流通股,緊隨其後的是第三大股東持有5.2%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步考察,我們發現該公司超過一半的股份由前8名股東持有,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far I can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.Insider Ownership Of PropTech Investment Corporation II

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。據我所知,沒有分析師對該公司的報道,因此它很可能是在低調行事。Proptech投資公司II的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為這可以表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of PropTech Investment Corporation II in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It appears that the board holds about US$1.3m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of US$279m. I generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.General Public Ownership

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有Proptech Investment Corporation II不到1%的股份。然而,我們確實注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構擁有間接利益。董事會似乎持有價值約130萬美元的股票。相比之下,該公司的市值為2.79億美元。我通常喜歡看到董事會投入更多資金。不過,或許值得一查的是,這些內部人士是否一直在買入。一般公有制

With a 24% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over PropTech Investment Corporation II. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.Private Company Ownership

由於擁有24%的股權,公眾對Proptech投資公司II有一定程度的影響力。這樣的持股規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司的政策。私營公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 20%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.Next Steps:

我們可以看到民營企業擁有20%的已發行股份。僅從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下是誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他相關方通過獨立的私人公司持有上市公司的股份。接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted1 warning sign for PropTech Investment Corporation IIyou should know about.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,考慮一下風險。每家公司都有,我們已經發現1個Proptech投資公司II的警告標誌你應該知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss thisfreelist of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你想看看另一家公司--擁有潛在的更好的財務狀況--那麼不要錯過這一點免費令人感興趣的公司名單,有強勁的財務數據支持。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年年報數據不一致。

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature.We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice.It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不是金融建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touchwith us directly.Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯團隊發電子郵件,地址是simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論