On Nov 19, major Wall Street analysts update their ratings for $Post Holdings (POST.US)$, with price targets ranging from $116 to $135.
J.P. Morgan analyst Kenneth Goldman maintains with a buy rating, and adjusts the target price from $125 to $135.
Barclays analyst Andrew Lazar maintains with a buy rating, and maintains the target price at $125.
Wells Fargo analyst Marc Torrente maintains with a hold rating, and adjusts the target price from $120 to $116.
Evercore analyst David Palmer maintains with a buy rating, and adjusts the target price from $123 to $126.
Furthermore, according to the comprehensive report, the opinions of $Post Holdings (POST.US)$'s main analysts recently are as follows:
The company concluded Q4 with momentum, bolstering the case for strong delivery in FY25. Although risks are present, the business shows profit advancements across its sectors despite fluctuations in top-line performance.
Following a quarter and outlook that surpassed EBITDA expectations, there's been an increase in the FY25 EBITDA estimate due to the company's enhanced execution and strategic capital allocation.
Here are the latest investment ratings and price targets for $Post Holdings (POST.US)$ from 4 analysts:
Note:
TipRanks, an independent third party, provides analysis data from financial analysts and calculates the Average Returns and Success Rates of the analysts' recommendations. The information presented is not an investment recommendation and is intended for informational purposes only.
Success rate is the number of the analyst's successful ratings, divided by his/her total number of ratings over the past year. A successful rating is one based on if TipRanks' virtual portfolio earned a positive return from the stock. Total average return is the average rate of return that the TipRanks' virtual portfolio has earned over the past year. These portfolios are established based on the analyst's preliminary rating and are adjusted according to the changes in the rating.
TipRanks provides a ranking of each analyst up to 5 stars, which is representative of all recommendations from the analyst. An analyst's past performance is evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars, with more stars indicating better performance. The star level is determined by his/her total success rate and average return.
