On Nov 13, major Wall Street analysts update their ratings for $Integral Ad Science (IAS.US)$, with price targets ranging from $13 to $16.
Morgan Stanley analyst Matthew Cost maintains with a hold rating, and maintains the target price at $13.
Barclays analyst Raimo Lenschow maintains with a hold rating, and maintains the target price at $13.
BMO Capital analyst Brian Pitz maintains with a buy rating, and maintains the target price at $16.
Truist Financial analyst Youssef Squali maintains with a buy rating.
Craig-Hallum analyst Jason Kreyer maintains with a buy rating.
Furthermore, according to the comprehensive report, the opinions of $Integral Ad Science (IAS.US)$'s main analysts recently are as follows:
Analysts recognize that Integral Ad Science is confronting challenges in the latter part of the year, guiding Q4 figures 6%/7% beneath estimates, despite a robust Q2 performance. This comes amid circulating press reports about a possible sale of the company.
Here are the latest investment ratings and price targets for $Integral Ad Science (IAS.US)$ from 5 analysts:
Note:
TipRanks, an independent third party, provides analysis data from financial analysts and calculates the Average Returns and Success Rates of the analysts' recommendations. The information presented is not an investment recommendation and is intended for informational purposes only.
Success rate is the number of the analyst's successful ratings, divided by his/her total number of ratings over the past year. A successful rating is one based on if TipRanks' virtual portfolio earned a positive return from the stock. Total average return is the average rate of return that the TipRanks' virtual portfolio has earned over the past year. These portfolios are established based on the analyst's preliminary rating and are adjusted according to the changes in the rating.
TipRanks provides a ranking of each analyst up to 5 stars, which is representative of all recommendations from the analyst. An analyst's past performance is evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars, with more stars indicating better performance. The star level is determined by his/her total success rate and average return.
