On Nov 01, major Wall Street analysts update their ratings for $Verisk Analytics (VRSK.US)$, with price targets ranging from $276 to $313.
Morgan Stanley analyst Toni Kaplan maintains with a hold rating, and maintains the target price at $283.
Barclays analyst Manav Patnaik maintains with a buy rating, and maintains the target price at $310.
UBS analyst Alex Kramm maintains with a hold rating, and adjusts the target price from $280 to $300.
Wells Fargo analyst Jason Haas CFA maintains with a buy rating, and adjusts the target price from $305 to $313.
Evercore analyst David Motemaden maintains with a hold rating, and adjusts the target price from $279 to $282.
Furthermore, according to the comprehensive report, the opinions of $Verisk Analytics (VRSK.US)$'s main analysts recently are as follows:
The sentiment towards Verisk Analytics has become slightly more positive following Q3 results, with the view on the investment remaining largely unchanged. The value of the portfolio is seen as a high-quality, non-cyclical compounder, although its positive attributes appear to be adequately recognized within its premium valuation.
Here are the latest investment ratings and price targets for $Verisk Analytics (VRSK.US)$ from 7 analysts:
Note:
TipRanks, an independent third party, provides analysis data from financial analysts and calculates the Average Returns and Success Rates of the analysts' recommendations. The information presented is not an investment recommendation and is intended for informational purposes only.
Success rate is the number of the analyst's successful ratings, divided by his/her total number of ratings over the past year. A successful rating is one based on if TipRanks' virtual portfolio earned a positive return from the stock. Total average return is the average rate of return that the TipRanks' virtual portfolio has earned over the past year. These portfolios are established based on the analyst's preliminary rating and are adjusted according to the changes in the rating.
TipRanks provides a ranking of each analyst up to 5 stars, which is representative of all recommendations from the analyst. An analyst's past performance is evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars, with more stars indicating better performance. The star level is determined by his/her total success rate and average return.
