share_log

Individual Investors Are Yijiahe Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603666) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥446m

Individual Investors Are Yijiahe Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603666) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥446m

個人投資者是億嘉和科技有限公司's (SHSE: 603666) 最大的所有者在市值下降4.46億元人民幣後受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  05/14 09:23

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Yijiahe Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Yijiahe Technology is 36%
  • 易家和科技擁有大量個人投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 52% 的業務由前五名股東持有
  • 易嘉和科技的內部所有權爲36%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Yijiahe Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603666), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 36% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着億嘉和科技股份有限公司(SHSE: 603666),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲36%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Following a 9.8% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 36% stock also took a hit.

繼上週股價下跌9.8%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大,但擁有36%股票的內部人士也受到打擊。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Yijiahe Technology.

在下圖中,我們放大了億嘉和科技的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603666 Ownership Breakdown May 14th 2024
SHSE: 603666 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yijiahe Technology?

關於易嘉和科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Yijiahe Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Yijiahe Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者持有億嘉和科技的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到億嘉和科技的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603666 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 14th 2024
SHSE: 603666 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 14 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Yijiahe Technology. Fuyun Zhu is currently the company's largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在易家和科技的股份不多。朱富雲目前是公司的最大股東,已發行股份的30%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的13%和3.3%。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現52%的股份由前五名股東持有。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Yijiahe Technology

億嘉和科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Yijiahe Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.1b, and insiders have CN¥1.5b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

內部人士似乎擁有億嘉和科技有限公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲41億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值15億元人民幣的股票。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Yijiahe Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有36%的所有權的普通大衆,主要是個人投資者,對易家和科技有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 13%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司13%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論