share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) With 87% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) With 87% Ownership

机构投资者在很大程度上依赖亚瑟·加拉格尔律师事务所(NYSE: AJG) 拥有 87% 的所有权
Simply Wall St ·  05/14 01:22

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Arthur J. Gallagher's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,亚瑟·加拉格尔的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 51% 的业务由前 15 名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

Every investor in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE:AJG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 的每位投资者纽约证券交易所代码:AJG)应该知道最强大的股东群体。机构拥有87%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$55b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 16% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周,在该公司的市值达到550亿美元之后,机构投资者最终受益最大。目前,一年股东回报率为16%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Arthur J. Gallagher.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Arthur J. Gallagher的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AJG Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:AJG 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arthur J. Gallagher?

关于亚瑟·加拉格尔,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Arthur J. Gallagher already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Arthur J. Gallagher's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

亚瑟·加拉格尔已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看亚瑟·加拉格尔的收入记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AJG Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:AJG收益和收入增长 2024年5月13日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Arthur J. Gallagher. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 6.9% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对亚瑟·加拉格尔进行有意义的投资。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股东,已发行股份的12%。贝莱德公司是第二大股东,拥有8.0%的普通股,资本研究与管理公司持有该公司约6.9%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前15位的公司合并所有权为51%,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Arthur J. Gallagher

亚瑟·加拉格尔的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. Insiders own US$658m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有亚瑟·加拉格尔公司的部分股份。内部人士拥有价值6.58亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益非常一致。尽管如此,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Arthur J. Gallagher. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有12%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对亚瑟·加拉格尔有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Arthur J. Gallagher that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了亚瑟·加拉格尔的3个警告信号,在投资之前,你应该注意这些信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发