share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這4項衡量標準表明,星座品牌(紐約證券交易所代碼:STZ)的債務使用情況相當不錯
Simply Wall St ·  05/12 21:23

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Constellation Brands, Inc. (NYSE:STZ) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。我們可以看到,Constellation Brands, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:STZ)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時危險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務爲企業提供幫助,直到企業難以用新的資本或自由現金流還清債務。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。但是,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。當然,債務的好處是它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它用高回報率進行再投資的能力取代了公司的稀釋時。當我們研究債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does Constellation Brands Carry?

星座品牌揹負了多少債務?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Constellation Brands had debt of US$11.9b at the end of February 2024, a reduction from US$12.4b over a year. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

您可以點擊下圖查看更多詳情,該圖片顯示,截至2024年2月底,Constellation Brands的債務爲119億美元,較上一年的124億美元有所減少。淨負債大致相同,因爲它沒有太多現金。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:STZ Debt to Equity History May 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:STZ 債券與股本的比率歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 12 日

How Healthy Is Constellation Brands' Balance Sheet?

星座品牌的資產負債表有多健康?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Constellation Brands had liabilities of US$3.14b due within a year, and liabilities of US$12.5b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$152.4m in cash and US$1.08b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$14.4b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Constellation Brands的負債爲31.4億美元,此後到期的負債爲125億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有1.524億美元的現金和10.8億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出144億美元。

Constellation Brands has a very large market capitalization of US$47.9b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

Constellation Brands的市值非常大,爲479億美元,因此,如果需要,它很可能會籌集資金以改善其資產負債表。但是,仍然值得仔細研究其償還債務的能力。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力:將其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。

Constellation Brands has net debt to EBITDA of 3.2 suggesting it uses a fair bit of leverage to boost returns. On the plus side, its EBIT was 7.3 times its interest expense, and its net debt to EBITDA, was quite high, at 3.2. Constellation Brands grew its EBIT by 7.3% in the last year. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Constellation Brands can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Constellation Brands的淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比例爲3.2,這表明它使用了相當多的槓桿作用來提高回報。從好的方面來看,其息稅前利潤是利息支出的7.3倍,其淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比例相當高,爲3.2。去年,星座品牌的息稅前利潤增長了7.3%。儘管這幾乎無法使我們大吃一驚,但在債務方面卻是一個積極因素。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但最終,該業務未來的盈利能力將決定Constellation Brands能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Constellation Brands recorded free cash flow worth 53% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,值得檢查一下息稅前利潤中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在最近三年中,Constellation Brands錄得的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的53%,鑑於自由現金流不包括利息和稅收,這幾乎是正常的。這種自由現金流使公司處於有利地位,可以在適當的時候償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Constellation Brands's interest cover was a real positive on this analysis, as was its EBIT growth rate. On the other hand, its net debt to EBITDA makes us a little less comfortable about its debt. Looking at all this data makes us feel a little cautious about Constellation Brands's debt levels. While debt does have its upside in higher potential returns, we think shareholders should definitely consider how debt levels might make the stock more risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Constellation Brands has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

Constellation Brands的利息保障對該分析非常樂觀,其息稅前利潤增長率也是如此。另一方面,其淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比例使我們對其債務不那麼滿意。查看所有這些數據使我們對Constellation Brands的債務水平感到有些謹慎。儘管債務在更高的潛在回報方面確實有其上行空間,但我們認爲股東們一定應該考慮債務水平如何使股票更具風險。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如,Constellation Brands 有 3 個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果你是那種喜歡在沒有債務負擔的情況下購買股票的投資者,那麼請立即查看我們的獨家淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論