share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SUPCON Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688777) Latest 3.3% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SUPCON Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688777) Latest 3.3% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

繼SUPCON科技有限公司之後,機構投資者可能會採取嚴厲措施。”s(SHSE: 688777)最近3.3%的跌幅增加了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  05/12 08:37

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies SUPCON Technology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insider ownership in SUPCON Technology is 18%
  • 高機構所有權意味着SUPCON Technology的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有11名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • SUPCON Technology的內部所有權爲18%

Every investor in SUPCON Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688777) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

中控科技股份有限公司(上海證券交易所股票代碼:688777)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲37%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥1.2b. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 29% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in SUPCON Technology's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

結果,在市值下跌12億元人民幣之後,機構投資者上週遭受了最大的損失。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步加劇了股東一年的29%的虧損,下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果SUPCON Technology的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到不得不出售該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SUPCON Technology.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於SUPCON Technology的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688777 Ownership Breakdown May 12th 2024
SHSE: 688777 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SUPCON Technology?

關於SUPCON技術,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

SUPCON Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SUPCON Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

SUPCON Technology已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到SUPCON Technology的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688777 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 12th 2024
SHSE: 688777 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 12 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in SUPCON Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Min Chu with 16% of shares outstanding. With 7.3% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hangzhou Yuancheng Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) and Zhejiang Supcon Technology Co., Ltd., ESOP are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對SUPCON Technology進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是朱敏,已發行股份的16%。杭州元成企業管理合夥企業(有限合夥)和浙江中控科技有限公司的已發行股份分別爲7.3%和6.0%,ESOP是第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記處來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前11名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of SUPCON Technology

SUPCON 科技的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of SUPCON Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥36b, and insiders have CN¥6.5b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有SUPCON科技有限公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲360億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值65億元人民幣的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 29% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over SUPCON Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

SUPCON Technology擁有29%的所有權,主要是個人投資者,對SUPCON Technology有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 8.4%, of the SUPCON Technology stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看來私營公司擁有SUPCON Technology股票8.4%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with SUPCON Technology (at least 1 which is potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經發現了SUPCON Technology的兩個警告信號(至少一個可能很嚴重),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論