share_log

Monolithic Power Systems' (NASDAQ:MPWR) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings

Monolithic Power Systems' (NASDAQ:MPWR) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings

Monolithic Power Systems(納斯達克股票代碼:MPWR)的保守會計可能會解釋疲軟收益
Simply Wall St ·  05/11 20:42

The market was pleased with the recent earnings report from Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:MPWR), despite the profit numbers being soft. However, we think the company is showing some signs that things are more promising than they seem.

儘管利潤數字疲軟,但市場對Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MPWR)最近的收益報告感到滿意。但是,我們認爲該公司顯示出一些跡象,表明情況比看起來更有希望。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:MPWR Earnings and Revenue History May 11th 2024
NASDAQGS: MPWR 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 11 日

Zooming In On Monolithic Power Systems' Earnings

放大單片電力系統的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

在高金融領域,用於衡量公司將申報的利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的效果的關鍵比率是應計比率(來自現金流)。簡而言之,該比率從淨利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以公司在此期間的平均運營資產。你可以將現金流的應計比率視爲 “非FCF利潤率”。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

這意味着負應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明該公司帶來的自由現金流超出了其利潤所暗示的範圍。儘管應計比率爲正(表明非現金利潤達到一定水平)不是問題,但高應計比率可以說是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙質利潤與現金流不匹配。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,總的來說,高應計比率對短期利潤來說是個壞兆頭。

Over the twelve months to March 2024, Monolithic Power Systems recorded an accrual ratio of -0.23. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$603m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of US$410.1m. Monolithic Power Systems shareholders are no doubt pleased that free cash flow improved over the last twelve months.

在截至2024年3月的十二個月中,Monolithic Power Systems的應計比率爲-0.23。因此,其法定收入大大低於其自由現金流。實際上,它去年的自由現金流爲6.03億美元,遠遠超過其4.101億美元的法定利潤。毫無疑問,Monolithic Power Systems的股東對過去十二個月中自由現金流的改善感到高興。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

Our Take On Monolithic Power Systems' Profit Performance

我們對單片電力系統的利潤表現的看法

As we discussed above, Monolithic Power Systems' accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that Monolithic Power Systems' statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And on top of that, its earnings per share have grown at an extremely impressive rate over the last three years. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. If you want to do dive deeper into Monolithic Power Systems, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Monolithic Power Systems.

正如我們上面討論的那樣,Monolithic Power Systems的應計比率表明利潤向自由現金流的強勁轉換,這對公司來說是一個積極的利潤。基於這一觀察,我們認爲Monolithic Power Systems的法定利潤實際上可能低估了其盈利潛力!最重要的是,在過去三年中,其每股收益以極其驚人的速度增長。歸根結底,如果你想正確地了解公司,必須考慮的不僅僅是上述因素。如果你想更深入地研究單片電源系統,你還需要研究它目前面臨的風險。例如,我們發現了 2 個警告信號,爲了更好地了解單片電源系統,你應該仔細檢查一下。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Monolithic Power Systems' profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

本報告僅研究了揭示單片電力系統利潤性質的單一因素。但是,還有很多其他方法可以讓你對公司的看法。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論