share_log

While Institutions Invested in Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:PGY) Benefited From Last Week's 22% Gain, Individual Investors Stood to Gain the Most

While Institutions Invested in Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:PGY) Benefited From Last Week's 22% Gain, Individual Investors Stood to Gain the Most

儘管投資Pagaya Technologies Ltd.(納斯達克股票代碼:PGY)的機構受益於上週22%的漲幅,但個人投資者的收益最大
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 21:49

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Pagaya Technologies indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 個人投資者對Pagaya Technologies的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 52% 的業務由前八名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的購買

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:PGY), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 34% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Pagaya Technologies Ltd.(納斯達克股票代碼:PGY),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。個人投資者擁有公司的最大股份,擁有34%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Following a 22% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 20% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

繼上週股價上漲22%之後,個人投資者獲利最多,但擁有20%股票的機構也將從漲幅中獲益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pagaya Technologies.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Pagaya Technologies的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:PGY Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
納斯達克公司:PGY 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pagaya Technologies?

關於Pagaya Technologies,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pagaya Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pagaya Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有Pagaya Technologies的相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Pagaya Technologies的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:PGY Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
納斯達克公司:PGY 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 10 日

Pagaya Technologies is not owned by hedge funds. Viola Ventures is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Gal Krubiner, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

Pagaya Technologies不歸對沖基金所有。Viola Ventures目前是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約7.9%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有7.2%的所有權。第三大股東蓋爾·克魯比納也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前8名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Pagaya Technologies

帕加亞科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Pagaya Technologies Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$740m, and insiders have US$146m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Pagaya科技有限公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲7.4億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1.46億美元的股票。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Pagaya Technologies. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Pagaya Technologies34%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 19%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司擁有19%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 6.1%, of the Pagaya Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看來私營公司擁有Pagaya Technologies6.1%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Pagaya Technologies that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Pagaya Technologies的兩個警告信號,在投資之前,你應該注意這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論