share_log

Chimera Investment Corporation's (NYSE:CIM) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 9.8% Gain Last Week

Chimera Investment Corporation's (NYSE:CIM) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 9.8% Gain Last Week

奇美拉投資公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CIM)的機構股東度過了愉快的一週,一年期回報率在上週上漲9.8%之後有所增加
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 18:06

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Chimera Investment's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着奇美拉投資的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 42% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Chimera Investment Corporation (NYSE:CIM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 50% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着奇美拉投資公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CIM),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有50%的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$101m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 5.4% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

在上週該公司的市值上漲了1.01億美元之後,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前,一年股東回報率爲5.4%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Chimera Investment, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Chimera Investment的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CIM Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CIM 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chimera Investment?

關於奇美拉投資,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Chimera Investment already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chimera Investment, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

奇美拉投資已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下奇美拉投資過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CIM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CIM 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 10 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Chimera Investment. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

對沖基金在奇美拉投資的股份不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲9.4%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.7%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有6.2%的所有權。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Chimera Investment

奇美拉投資的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Chimera Investment Corporation. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$8.3m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有奇美拉投資公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值830萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 49% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司49%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Chimera Investment (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了 Chimera Investment 的 3 個警告信號(1 個有點令人擔憂!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論