share_log

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Touches US$1.5b Market Cap

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Touches US$1.5b Market Cap

隨着FLEX LNG Ltd.(紐約證券交易所代碼:FLNG)市值達到15億美元,擁有大量所有權的內部人士是主要的捐助者
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 19:28

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • FLEX LNG's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in FLEX LNG is 21%
  • FLEX LNG 的大量內部所有權表明公司擴張有固有的利益
  • 50% 的業務由前四名股東持有
  • FLEX LNG的機構所有權爲21%

Every investor in FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

FLEX LNG Ltd.(紐約證券交易所代碼:FLNG)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人內部人士,準確地說約爲44%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$1.5b market cap following a 3.8% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲3.8%後達到15億美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of FLEX LNG, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究FLEX LNG的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FLNG Ownership Breakdown May 8th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FLNG 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FLEX LNG?

關於FLEX LNG,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that FLEX LNG does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of FLEX LNG, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,FLEX LNG確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下FLEX LNG過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FLNG Earnings and Revenue Growth May 8th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FLNG收益和收入增長 2024年5月8日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in FLEX LNG. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is John Fredriksen with 43% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.9% and 2.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對FLEX LNG進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是約翰·弗雷德裏克森,已發行股份的43%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的2.9%和2.3%。

On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現50%的股份由前四名股東持有。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of FLEX LNG

FLEX LNG 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of FLEX LNG Ltd.. Insiders own US$634m worth of shares in the US$1.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

內部人士似乎擁有FLEX LNG LNG有限公司的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家價值15億美元的公司價值6.34億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in FLEX LNG. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有FLEX LNG36%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for FLEX LNG (of which 2 don't sit too well with us!) you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有,我們發現了 FLEX LNG 的 3 個警告信號(其中 2 個對我們來說不太合適!)你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論