share_log

Institutional Investors Are D.R. Horton, Inc.'s (NYSE:DHI) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$2.9b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are D.R. Horton, Inc.'s (NYSE:DHI) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$2.9b Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是 D.R. Horton, Inc.s(紐約證券交易所代碼:DHI)最大的博彩玩家在上週市值增長29億美元后獲得了獎勵
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 18:23

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, D.R. Horton's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 16 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,D.R. Horton的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前16名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

To get a sense of who is truly in control of D.R. Horton, Inc. (NYSE:DHI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了D.R. Horton, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:DHI),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲86%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$2.9b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 40% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

在上週該公司的市值上漲了29億美元之後,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前,一年的投資回報率爲40%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about D.R. Horton.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於D.R. Horton的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:DHI Ownership Breakdown May 8th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DHI 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About D.R. Horton?

關於D.R. Horton,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in D.R. Horton. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at D.R. Horton's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者持有D.R. Horton的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看D.R. Horton的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:DHI Earnings and Revenue Growth May 8th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DHI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 8 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. D.R. Horton is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。D.R. Horton 不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲11%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的10%和9.4%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前16名股東的合併所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of D.R. Horton

D.R. Horton 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in D.R. Horton, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$1.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有D.R. Horton, Inc.的股份。它是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有價值11億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司12%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with D.R. Horton .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在 D.R. Horton 身上發現的 1 個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論