share_log

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Weave Communications, Inc. (NYSE:WEAV) After 21% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Weave Communications, Inc. (NYSE:WEAV) After 21% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

投資Weave Communications, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:WEAV)的私募股權公司痛苦的一週在下跌21%之後,機構也遭受了損失
Simply Wall St ·  05/03 21:05

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Weave Communications by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • 36% of Weave Communications is held by Institutions
  • 私募股權公司對Weave Communications的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的權力來影響管理和治理相關決策
  • 共有6位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • Weave Communications 36% 的股份由機構持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Weave Communications, Inc. (NYSE:WEAV), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private equity firms with 43% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了Weave Communications, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:WEAV),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有43%所有權的私募股權公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

While institutions who own 36% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$776m last week,private equity firms took the most losses.

儘管上週市值跌至7.76億美元后,持有36%的機構承受了壓力,但私募股權公司的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Weave Communications.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Weave Communications的信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:WEAV Ownership Breakdown May 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:WEAV 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Weave Communications?

關於Weave Communications,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Weave Communications. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Weave Communications, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在Weave Communications中擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看Weave Communications過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:WEAV Earnings and Revenue Growth May 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:WEAV 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 3 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Weave Communications. CrossLink Capital, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 10% of the stock. In addition, we found that Brett White, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.

對沖基金在Weave Communications中的股票不多。CrossLink Capital, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約12%和10%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官佈雷特·懷特以其名義分配了0.9%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前六名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Weave Communications

Weave 通訊的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Weave Communications, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$21m worth of stock in the US$776m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Weave Communications, Inc.的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值7.76億美元的公司價值2100萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司18%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 43%, private equity firms could influence the Weave Communications board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有43%的股份,可能會影響Weave Communications董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Weave Communications is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,Weave Communications在我們的投資分析中顯示了3個警告信號,你應該知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論