share_log

The Recent 9.4% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Michael Petrie's Week, Merchants Bancorp's (NASDAQ:MBIN) Most Bullish Insider

The Recent 9.4% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Michael Petrie's Week, Merchants Bancorp's (NASDAQ:MBIN) Most Bullish Insider

最近9.4%的涨幅一定是首席执行官迈克尔·皮特里本周的亮点,即Merchants Bancorp(纳斯达克股票代码:MBIN)的 “最看涨内幕”
Simply Wall St ·  05/03 18:53

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Merchants Bancorp's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • 28% of Merchants Bancorp is held by Institutions
  • Merchants Bancorp的大量内部所有权表明了公司扩张的固有利益
  • 50% 的业务由前 8 名股东持有
  • Merchants Bancorp的28%由机构持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Merchants Bancorp (NASDAQ:MBIN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 40% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了Merchants Bancorp(纳斯达克股票代码:MBIN),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有40%所有权的个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$160m last week.

显然,上周该公司的市值上涨了1.6亿美元之后,内部人士受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Merchants Bancorp.

在下图中,我们放大了Merchants Bancorp的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:MBIN Ownership Breakdown May 3rd 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:MBIN 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Merchants Bancorp?

关于Merchants Bancorp,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Merchants Bancorp. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Merchants Bancorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者在Merchants Bancorp中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看Merchants Bancorp过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:MBIN Earnings and Revenue Growth May 3rd 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:MBIN 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 3 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Merchants Bancorp. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Michael Petrie with 31% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 3.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Randall Rogers and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

对冲基金在Merchants Bancorp的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官迈克尔·皮特里,已发行股份的31%。兰德尔·罗杰斯和贝莱德公司分别拥有7.4%和3.4%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前8名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of Merchants Bancorp

Merchants Bancorp 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Merchants Bancorp. Insiders own US$727m worth of shares in the US$1.8b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Merchants Bancorp合理比例的股份。内部人士拥有这家价值18亿美元的公司价值7.27亿美元的股份。这很有意义。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Merchants Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Merchants Bancorp拥有32%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对Merchants Bancorp有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Merchants Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Merchants Bancorp,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜欢查看收入增长的历史。您也可以,通过访问此详细图表中的这张免费的历史收入和收益图表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发