share_log

Earnings Report: Citic Press Corporation Missed Revenue Estimates By 16%

Earnings Report: Citic Press Corporation Missed Revenue Estimates By 16%

收益報告:中信出版集團未達到收入預期16%
Simply Wall St ·  05/02 06:09

Citic Press Corporation (SZSE:300788) came out with its first-quarter results last week, and we wanted to see how the business is performing and what industry forecasters think of the company following this report. Revenues were CN¥402m, 16% below analyst expectations, although losses didn't appear to worsen significantly, with a statutory per-share loss of CN¥0.61 being in line with what the analysts anticipated. Earnings are an important time for investors, as they can track a company's performance, look at what the analysts are forecasting for next year, and see if there's been a change in sentiment towards the company. We've gathered the most recent statutory forecasts to see whether the analysts have changed their earnings models, following these results.

中信出版集團(深圳證券交易所代碼:300788)上週公佈了第一季度業績,我們想看看該業務的表現如何,以及行業預測員對該公司的看法。收入爲4.02億元人民幣,比分析師的預期低16%,儘管虧損似乎沒有顯著惡化,法定每股虧損0.61元人民幣符合分析師的預期。對於投資者來說,盈利是一個重要時刻,因爲他們可以追蹤公司的業績,查看分析師對明年的預測,看看對公司的情緒是否發生了變化。根據這些結果,我們收集了最新的法定預測,以了解分析師是否改變了盈利模式。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300788 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 1st 2024
SZSE: 300788 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 1 日

Taking into account the latest results, the consensus forecast from Citic Press' six analysts is for revenues of CN¥1.85b in 2024. This reflects a meaningful 9.0% improvement in revenue compared to the last 12 months. Per-share earnings are expected to bounce 37% to CN¥0.81. Before this earnings report, the analysts had been forecasting revenues of CN¥2.01b and earnings per share (EPS) of CN¥1.28 in 2024. From this we can that sentiment has definitely become more bearish after the latest results, leading to lower revenue forecasts and a large cut to earnings per share estimates.

考慮到最新業績,中信出版社的六位分析師的共識預測是,2024年的收入爲18.5億元人民幣。這反映了與過去12個月相比,收入顯著增長了9.0%。每股收益預計將反彈37%,至0.81元人民幣。在本業績發佈之前,分析師一直預測2024年的收入爲201億元人民幣,每股收益(EPS)爲1.28元人民幣。由此我們可以看出,在最新業績公佈之後,市場情緒肯定變得更加悲觀了,這導致收入預期降低,每股收益預期大幅下調。

Despite the cuts to forecast earnings, there was no real change to the CN¥31.95 price target, showing that the analysts don't think the changes have a meaningful impact on its intrinsic value. The consensus price target is just an average of individual analyst targets, so - it could be handy to see how wide the range of underlying estimates is. There are some variant perceptions on Citic Press, with the most bullish analyst valuing it at CN¥33.54 and the most bearish at CN¥31.10 per share. The narrow spread of estimates could suggest that the business' future is relatively easy to value, or thatthe analysts have a strong view on its prospects.

儘管下調了預期收益,但31.95元人民幣的目標股價沒有實際變化,這表明分析師認爲這些變化不會對其內在價值產生有意義的影響。共識目標股價只是個別分析師目標的平均值,因此——可以很方便地看到基礎估計值的範圍有多廣。中信出版社有一些不同的看法,最看漲的分析師認爲中信出版社爲33.54元人民幣,最看跌的爲每股31.10元人民幣。估計值的狹窄差異可能表明該業務的未來相對容易估值,或者分析師對其前景有強烈的看法。

Taking a look at the bigger picture now, one of the ways we can understand these forecasts is to see how they compare to both past performance and industry growth estimates. For example, we noticed that Citic Press' rate of growth is expected to accelerate meaningfully, with revenues forecast to exhibit 12% growth to the end of 2024 on an annualised basis. That is well above its historical decline of 0.5% a year over the past five years. Compare this against analyst estimates for the broader industry, which suggest that (in aggregate) industry revenues are expected to grow 13% annually. So while Citic Press' revenues are expected to improve, it seems that it is expected to grow at about the same rate as the overall industry.

現在從大局來看,我們理解這些預測的方法之一是了解它們與過去的業績和行業增長估計相比如何。例如,我們注意到,中信出版社的增長率預計將大幅加快,預計到2024年底,收入按年計算將實現12%的增長。這遠高於其在過去五年中每年0.5%的歷史下降幅度。相比之下,分析師對整個行業的估計表明,(總計)行業收入預計每年將增長13%。因此,儘管預計中信出版社的收入將有所改善,但預計其增長速度將與整個行業大致相同。

The Bottom Line

底線

The most important thing to take away is that the analysts downgraded their earnings per share estimates, showing that there has been a clear decline in sentiment following these results. They also downgraded their revenue estimates, although as we saw earlier, forecast growth is only expected to be about the same as the wider industry. The consensus price target held steady at CN¥31.95, with the latest estimates not enough to have an impact on their price targets.

要了解的最重要的一點是,分析師下調了每股收益的預期,這表明公佈這些業績後,市場情緒明顯下降。他們還下調了收入預期,儘管正如我們之前看到的那樣,預計增長僅與整個行業大致相同。共識目標股價穩定在31.95元人民幣,最新估計不足以對其目標股價產生影響。

With that in mind, we wouldn't be too quick to come to a conclusion on Citic Press. Long-term earnings power is much more important than next year's profits. We have estimates - from multiple Citic Press analysts - going out to 2026, and you can see them free on our platform here.

考慮到這一點,我們不會很快就中信出版社得出結論。長期盈利能力比明年的利潤重要得多。根據中信出版社多位分析師的估計,預計將持續到2026年,你可以在我們的平台上免費查看。

You should always think about risks though. Case in point, we've spotted 3 warning signs for Citic Press you should be aware of.

但是,你應該時刻考慮風險。舉個例子,我們發現了中信出版社的3個警告信號,你應該注意了。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論