share_log

INESA Intelligent Tech Inc.'s (SHSE:600602) Last Week's 6.3% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

INESA Intelligent Tech Inc.'s (SHSE:600602) Last Week's 6.3% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

INESA 智能科技公司s(SHSE: 600602)上週6.3%的跌幅一定讓持有大量股份的散戶投資者感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  04/22 11:29

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • INESA Intelligent Tech's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • INESA Intelligent Tech擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 共有25名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有43%的所有權
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

A look at the shareholders of INESA Intelligent Tech Inc. (SHSE:600602) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 56% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看INESA智能科技公司(SHSE: 600602)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有56%所有權的散戶投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

And following last week's 6.3% decline in share price, retail investors suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌6.3%之後,散戶投資者遭受的損失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of INESA Intelligent Tech.

在下圖中,我們放大了INESA智能科技的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600602 Ownership Breakdown April 22nd 2024
SHSE: 600602 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About INESA Intelligent Tech?

關於INESA智能科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

INESA Intelligent Tech already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see INESA Intelligent Tech's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

INESA Intelligent Tech已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到INESA Intelligent Tech的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600602 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 22nd 2024
SHSE: 600602 2024 年 4 月 22 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in INESA Intelligent Tech. INESA (Group) Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.0% and 0.7% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對INESA智能科技進行有意義的投資。INESA(集團)有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的35%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約1.0%和0.7%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of INESA Intelligent Tech

INESA 智能科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of INESA Intelligent Tech Inc.. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥64m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的INESA智能科技公司不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值6400萬元人民幣的股票。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 56% of INESA Intelligent Tech shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有INESA智能科技56%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 35%, of the INESA Intelligent Tech stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私營公司似乎擁有INESA智能科技股票35%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that INESA Intelligent Tech is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,INESA Intelligent Tech在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,你應該知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論