share_log

Private Equity Firms Invested in Montana Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ:AIRJ) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$57m Market Cap Decline

Private Equity Firms Invested in Montana Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ:AIRJ) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$57m Market Cap Decline

投資蒙大拿州科技公司(納斯達克股票代碼:AIRJ)的私募股權公司首當其衝地應對了上週5700萬美元市值下降的衝擊
Simply Wall St ·  04/18 18:40

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Montana Technologies' significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 62% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • 22% of Montana Technologies is held by insiders
  • 蒙大拿科技公司的大量私募股權公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 62% 的業務由前三名股東持有
  • 蒙大拿科技公司22%的股份由內部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Montana Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ:AIRJ) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看蒙大拿科技公司(納斯達克股票代碼:AIRJ)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,私募股權公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲42%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And following last week's 9.6% decline in share price, private equity firms suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌9.6%之後,私募股權公司遭受的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Montana Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究蒙大拿科技的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AIRJ Ownership Breakdown April 18th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:AIRJ 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 18 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Montana Technologies?

關於蒙大拿州科技,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們往往不會看到機構投資者持有風險很大、交易量稀少或規模很小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時會看到大公司沒有註冊機構,但這種情況並不特別常見。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Montana Technologies, for yourself, below.

公司在股票登記處可能沒有任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立立場的機會。另一方面,專業投資者總是有可能避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是賺錢的最佳去處。機構投資者可能不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面親眼看到蒙大拿科技過去的收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AIRJ Earnings and Revenue Growth April 18th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:AIRJ 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 18 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Montana Technologies. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Three Curve Capital LP with 35% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 13%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Matthew Jore, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對蒙大拿科技公司進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Three Curve Capital LP,已發行股份的35%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的14%和13%。第二大股東馬修·喬爾也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 62% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,3名最大股東通過其62%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Montana Technologies

蒙大拿科技的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Montana Technologies Corporation. Insiders own US$121m worth of shares in the US$560m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有蒙大拿科技公司的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家價值5.6億美元的公司價值1.21億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Montana Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有23%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對蒙大拿科技公司有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 42% stake in Montana Technologies. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有蒙大拿科技公司42%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the Montana Technologies stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

看來私營公司擁有蒙大拿科技公司13%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Montana Technologies has 4 warning signs (and 3 which are potentially serious) we think you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。舉個風險爲例——我們認爲你應該知道4個警告信號(還有3個可能很嚴重的警告)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論