share_log

MFA Financial, Inc.'s (NYSE:MFA) Institutional Investors Lost 9.0% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

MFA Financial, Inc.'s (NYSE:MFA) Institutional Investors Lost 9.0% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

MFA Financial, Inc. 's(纽约证券交易所代码:MFA)机构投资者在过去一周下跌了9.0%,但已从长期收益中获利
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 18:22

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, MFA Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 20 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,MFA Financial的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 前20名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

A look at the shareholders of MFA Financial, Inc. (NYSE:MFA) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 62% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看MFA Financial, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:MFA)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有62%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 9.0% in value last week. However, the 17% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降9.0%的机构投资者。但是,17%的一年期回报率可能有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但是他们可能会对未来的损失保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of MFA Financial, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究MFA Financial的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MFA Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
纽约证券交易所:MFA 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MFA Financial?

关于MFA Financial,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MFA Financial. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at MFA Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所见,机构投资者在MFA Financial中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看MFA Financial的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MFA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
纽约证券交易所:MFA收益和收入增长 2024年4月17日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in MFA Financial. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.8% of shares outstanding. With 9.3% and 8.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Wellington Management Group LLP are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Craig Knutson is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对MFA Financial进行有意义的投资。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为9.8%。贝莱德公司和惠灵顿管理集团有限责任公司分别拥有9.3%和8.6%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。此外,首席执行官克雷格·纳特森持有该公司0.6%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前20位的公司合并所有权为50%,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of MFA Financial

MFA Financial的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in MFA Financial, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$12m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有MFA Financial, Inc.的部分股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的有意义的调整通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约1200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司37%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司的政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MFA Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for MFA Financial you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解MFA Financial,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的MFA Financial的两个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发