share_log

Individual Investors Account for 57% of Nano Dimension Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:NNDM) Ownership, While Institutions Account for 31%

Individual Investors Account for 57% of Nano Dimension Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:NNDM) Ownership, While Institutions Account for 31%

个人投资者占纳米维度有限公司的57%。”s(纳斯达克股票代码:NNDM)的所有权,而机构占31%
Simply Wall St ·  03/26 19:48

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Nano Dimension's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 40% ownership
  • Institutions own 31% of Nano Dimension
  • Nano Dimension拥有大量个人投资者所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
  • 共有25名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有40%的所有权
  • 机构拥有Nano Dimension31%的股份

Every investor in Nano Dimension Ltd. (NASDAQ:NNDM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Nano Dimension Ltd.(纳斯达克股票代码:NNDM)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的群体是拥有57%所有权的个人投资者。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 31% of the company's shareholders. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.

同时,机构占公司股东的31%。大公司通常以机构为股东,我们通常会看到内部人士拥有小型公司的股份。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nano Dimension.

在下图中,我们放大了Nano Dimension的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:NNDM Ownership Breakdown March 26th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:NNDM 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nano Dimension?

关于纳米维度,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

Nano Dimension already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nano Dimension, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Nano Dimension已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Nano Dimension过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:NNDM Earnings and Revenue Growth March 26th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:NNDM收益和收入增长 2024年3月26日

It would appear that 9.3% of Nano Dimension shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Anson Group, with ownership of 9.3%. With 9.2% and 3.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Murchinson Ltd. , Asset Management Arm and Boothbay Fund Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Yoav Stern, the CEO has 2.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

看来Nano Dimension有9.3%的股票由对冲基金控制。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。该公司的最大股东是安森集团,所有权为9.3%。默钦森有限公司、资产管理部门和Boothbay Fund Management, LLC分别占已发行股份的9.2%和3.5%,是第二和第三大股东。此外,我们发现首席执行官约夫·斯特恩以其名义分配了2.1%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票分布广泛,没有占主导地位的股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Nano Dimension

纳米维度的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Nano Dimension Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$15m worth of the US$604m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Nano Dimension Ltd的部分股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值6.04亿美元的公司价值1500万美元。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 57% of Nano Dimension shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公众主要由个人投资者组成,共持有Nano Dimension57%的股份。有了这么多的所有权,散户投资者可以在影响股东回报的决策中共同发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并行使投票权。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Nano Dimension you should be aware of.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。一个很好的例子:我们发现了 1 个你应该注意的 Nano Dimension 警告标志。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发