share_log

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Have the Largest Holding in Freedom Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:FRHC) With a 71% Ownership

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Have the Largest Holding in Freedom Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:FRHC) With a 71% Ownership

尽管最近出现抛售,但业内人士仍持有自由控股公司(纳斯达克股票代码:FRHC)的最大股份,所有权为71%
Simply Wall St ·  03/13 21:47

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Freedom Holding's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 71% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Timur Turlov)
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • Freedom Holding拥有大量内部所有权,这表明公司扩张有固有的利益
  • 公司71%的股份由单一股东持有(铁木尔·图洛夫)
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

A look at the shareholders of Freedom Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:FRHC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看自由控股公司(纳斯达克股票代码:FRHC)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。个人内部人士持有71%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Even though insiders have sold shares recently, the group owns the most numbers of shares in the company.

尽管内部人士最近出售了股票,但该集团拥有该公司最多的股份。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Freedom Holding, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Freedom Holding的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:FRHC Ownership Breakdown March 13th 2024
纳斯达克公司:FRHC 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Freedom Holding?

关于自由控股,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Less than 5% of Freedom Holding is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

自由控股公司只有不到5%的股份由机构投资者持有。这表明一些基金将目光投向了该公司,但许多基金尚未购买该公司的股票。因此,如果公司本身能够随着时间的推移而有所改善,那么将来我们很可能会看到更多的机构买家。当一些大型机构想同时购买某只股票时,我们有时会看到股价上涨。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的历史可能有助于考虑是否会有更多的机构投资者想要这只股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:FRHC Earnings and Revenue Growth March 13th 2024
纳斯达克公司:FRHC 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 13 日

Freedom Holding is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Timur Turlov is the largest shareholder with 71% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 0.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Askar Tashtitov is also President, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

自由控股不归对冲基金所有。该公司首席执行官铁木尔·图尔洛夫是最大股东,已发行股份为71%。凭借如此巨额的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。当内部人士拥有公司的大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到一位拥有如此风险的公司内部人士。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约0.2%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有0.1%的所有权。有趣的是,第二大股东阿斯卡尔·塔什蒂托夫再次担任总裁,他指出公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of Freedom Holding

自由控股的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Freedom Holding Corp.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of US$4.4b, that means insiders have a whopping US$3.2b worth of shares in their own names. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有自由控股公司的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。鉴于其市值为44亿美元,这意味着内部人士以自己的名义拥有高达32亿美元的股票。大多数人会认为这是积极的,显示出与股东的强烈一致性。您可以点击此处查看他们是否一直在出售其股份。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司27%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Freedom Holding better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地理解自由控股公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

许多人发现,深入了解一家公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问这张过去的收益、收入和现金流的详细图表。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发