share_log

Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LYEL) Institutional Investors Lost 8.6% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LYEL) Institutional Investors Lost 8.6% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:LYEL)機構投資者在過去一週下跌了8.6%,但已從長期漲勢中獲利
Simply Wall St ·  03/05 20:11

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lyell Immunopharma's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 高機構所有權意味着Lyell Immunopharma的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 52% 的業務由前6名股東持有
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

Every investor in Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 49% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LYEL)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有49%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$56m last week. However, the 25% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值下降了5600萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,股東25%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lyell Immunopharma.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Lyell Immunopharma的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LYEL Ownership Breakdown March 5th 2024
納斯達克GS:LYEL 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lyell Immunopharma?

關於萊爾 Immunopharma,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Lyell Immunopharma already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lyell Immunopharma, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Lyell Immunopharma已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Lyell Immunopharma過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LYEL Earnings and Revenue Growth March 5th 2024
納斯達克GS:LYEL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 5 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lyell Immunopharma. Arch Venture Partners, L.P. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 7.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, GSK plc and Mwg Management Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Lyell Immunopharma進行有意義的投資。Arch Venture Partners, L.P. 目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲14%。葛蘭素史克集團和Mwg管理有限公司分別擁有12%和7.9%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有6人約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Lyell Immunopharma

Lyell Immunopharma 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$662m, and insiders have US$23m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲6.62億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2300萬美元的股票。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lyell Immunopharma. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Lyell Immunopharma擁有12%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Lyell Immunopharma有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 20%, private equity firms could influence the Lyell Immunopharma board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有20%的股份,可能會影響Lyell Immunopharma董事會。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 15% of the Lyell Immunopharma shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有Lyell Immunopharma已發行股票的15%。我們無法確定,但這很可能是一個戰略利益。這些企業可能是相似的,也可以是合作的。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Lyell Immunopharma (at least 2 which are concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經發現了Lyell Immunopharma的4個警告信號(至少有2個令人擔憂),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論